Field experience in the research process: Contributions to breaking the reason/emotion dualism

Descripción del Articulo

This article aims to highlight the epistemic value of emotions in research, considering feminist criticism of the hierarchical power relationship that is traditionally maintained between the subject and the researcher in qualitative methodology. Through field experience and elements that situate and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Herrera-Farfan, Nicole, Riveres, Rosa
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23720
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/espiral/article/view/23720
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:feminist methodology
epistemology
narrative production
male domination
metodología feminista
epistemología
producción narrativa
dominación masculina
metodologia feminista
epistemologia
produção de narrativas
dominação masculina
Descripción
Sumario:This article aims to highlight the epistemic value of emotions in research, considering feminist criticism of the hierarchical power relationship that is traditionally maintained between the subject and the researcher in qualitative methodology. Through field experience and elements that situate and empower the subjects, emotionally sensed knowledge is generated and validated by those who experience it. The co-production of narrative life stories becomes a central element in the proposed analysis, providing an opportunity to comprehend the dynamics of male dominance and the exercises of power prevalent in the intimate relationships of women who have experienced violence from incarcerated men, as presented in the experience of La Chora. The methodological and creative approach, therefore, becomes crucial in the theoretical and methodological discussion.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).