Programa de uso ético de la inteligencia artificial para mejorar la integridad académica en estudiantes de sexto ciclo de educación primaria en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y Humanidades Iquitos 2024
Descripción del Articulo
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the ethical use of artificial intelligence program to improve academic integrity in sixth-year primary school students at the Faculty of Education Sciences and Humanities -FCEH- Iquitos 2024, using a quantitative evaluative approach with a quasi-experimenta...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | tesis doctoral |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana |
| Repositorio: | UNAPIquitos-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/12061 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/12061 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Ética de la tecnología Inteligencia artificial Responsabilidad (educación) Estudiante universitario https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.01 |
| Sumario: | This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the ethical use of artificial intelligence program to improve academic integrity in sixth-year primary school students at the Faculty of Education Sciences and Humanities -FCEH- Iquitos 2024, using a quantitative evaluative approach with a quasi-experimental, field-based, longitudinal, and univariate design. A total of 70 students were sampled, distributed into an experimental group and a control group, selected through intentional non-probability sampling. The intervention, developed over 12 weeks in the experimental group, was evaluated using a standardized test administered before and after its implementation. The analyses conducted indicate that the implementation of the ethical use of artificial intelligence program had a highly significant impact on improving the academic integrity of sixth-grade students at the FCEH. Given that p-value = 0.001 < 1% (α = 0.01), the null hypothesis was rejected, and the alternative hypothesis was accepted at a confidence level of 99.9%. Improvements were also found in both the overall average and each of the five academic dimensions (academic honesty, responsibility, transparency, respect, and equity), confirming the program's effectiveness as a training strategy for strengthening students' academic ethics. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).