Active methodological strategy "teamwork" to the development of the competence "quantity problem solving" in the area of mathematics in elementary school
Descripción del Articulo
The study aims to apply the active methodological strategy "Teamwork" to improve the development of the competence "solving quantity problems" in students of the Fourth Grade of Primary Education in the area of Mathematics at the Emblematic Educational Institution "Simón Bol...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Universidad Privada de Tacna |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Privada de Tacna |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.upt.edu.pe:article/686 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upt.edu.pe/ojs/index.php/vestsc/article/view/686 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Competencia “resolución de problemas de cantidad” área de matemática estrategia metodológica activa “trabajo en equipo” Competence area of mathematics active methodological strategy |
Sumario: | The study aims to apply the active methodological strategy "Teamwork" to improve the development of the competence "solving quantity problems" in students of the Fourth Grade of Primary Education in the area of Mathematics at the Emblematic Educational Institution "Simón Bolívar” Of Moquegua in 2019. As scopes we have that it was possible to diagnose the factor that causes the low academic level in students, then describe the way in which the active methodological strategy "Teamwork" is applied and in this way analyze the elation ship that exists between the two variables, concluding with demonstrating its effectiveness. This research is characterized by having used the application-type methodology, with a quasi-experimental design of two non-randomized groups. The population consisted of 79 students, obtaining as a result that in section "A" as in "C" a "level of achievement" of 17% was obtained, and in the "process level" a 14% was obtained. in section "A" and 4% in section "C" demonstrating significant efficacy in the two experimental groups. The significant conclusion is that "achievement" was obtained in section "A" of 24% and in "C" of 28% and in section "Process" it was obtained in section "A" of 20% and in the "C" of 7%, which shows a substantial improvement. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).