Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat

Descripción del Articulo

The study aimed to determine the effect of the level of inclusion of silage from trout residues (ERT) in concentrate feed on body weight, feed intake, feed conversion of pigs and taste of pig meat. Three treatments were applied: a control (T1, 0%) and two treated groups with 5% (T2) and 10% (T3) of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Calderón-Quispe, Víctor, Churacutipa-Mamani, Marisol, Salas, Alberto, Barriga-Sánchez, Maritza, Araníbar, Marcelino J.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/13055
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13055
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:pigs
trout silage
productive performance
feeding
cerdos
ensilado de trucha
rendimiento productivo
alimentación
id REVUNMSM_bbcded8bf2496d454315ab5f8670040b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/13055
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
Inclusión de Ensilado de Residuos de Trucha en el Alimento de Cerdos y su Efecto en el Rendimiento Productivo y Sabor de la Carne
title Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
spellingShingle Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
Calderón-Quispe, Víctor
pigs
trout silage
productive performance
feeding
cerdos
ensilado de trucha
rendimiento productivo
alimentación
title_short Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
title_full Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
title_fullStr Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
title_sort Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meat
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Calderón-Quispe, Víctor
Churacutipa-Mamani, Marisol
Salas, Alberto
Barriga-Sánchez, Maritza
Araníbar, Marcelino J.
author Calderón-Quispe, Víctor
author_facet Calderón-Quispe, Víctor
Churacutipa-Mamani, Marisol
Salas, Alberto
Barriga-Sánchez, Maritza
Araníbar, Marcelino J.
author_role author
author2 Churacutipa-Mamani, Marisol
Salas, Alberto
Barriga-Sánchez, Maritza
Araníbar, Marcelino J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv pigs
trout silage
productive performance
feeding
cerdos
ensilado de trucha
rendimiento productivo
alimentación
topic pigs
trout silage
productive performance
feeding
cerdos
ensilado de trucha
rendimiento productivo
alimentación
description The study aimed to determine the effect of the level of inclusion of silage from trout residues (ERT) in concentrate feed on body weight, feed intake, feed conversion of pigs and taste of pig meat. Three treatments were applied: a control (T1, 0%) and two treated groups with 5% (T2) and 10% (T3) of ERT in the ration, with five replicates per treatment. Thirty non-castrated male pigs (York-Duroc-Landrace) of 45 days of age were used. Feeds for the growing and finishing phase were formulated to be similar in protein (CP) and energy (ME) content (growing: 16.0% CP and 3.20 Mcal ME/kg and finishing: 13.0% CP and 3.20 Mcal ME/kg) and were administered ad libitum during 98 days. Body weight, feed intake and feed conversion rate were determined at 56 and 98 days. In addition, a sensory test of meat was carried out at the end of the study to evaluate the taste of the meat. The results at day 98 showed no differences between treatments on body weight (69.8, 81.3 and 86.4 kg for T1, T2 and T3 respectively) and feed intake (1.30, 1.50 and 1.54 kg/day for T1, T2 and T3 respectively). However, feed conversion improved when ERT was added to the ration (2.25, 2.15 and 2.04 for T1, T2 and T3 respectively, p=0.012). The sensorial evaluation indicated that ERT inclusion in feed did not affect the taste of the meat. In conclusion, the inclusion up to 10% of ERT in pig feed improves feed conversion and do not affect the taste of meat.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13055
10.15381/rivep.v28i2.13055
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13055
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v28i2.13055
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13055/11911
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2017); 265-274
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2017); 265-274
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238227679903744
spelling Effect of the inclusion of silage of trout residues in pigs feed and its effect on the productive performance and the taste of meatInclusión de Ensilado de Residuos de Trucha en el Alimento de Cerdos y su Efecto en el Rendimiento Productivo y Sabor de la CarneCalderón-Quispe, VíctorChuracutipa-Mamani, MarisolSalas, AlbertoBarriga-Sánchez, MaritzaAraníbar, Marcelino J.pigstrout silageproductive performancefeedingcerdosensilado de trucharendimiento productivoalimentaciónThe study aimed to determine the effect of the level of inclusion of silage from trout residues (ERT) in concentrate feed on body weight, feed intake, feed conversion of pigs and taste of pig meat. Three treatments were applied: a control (T1, 0%) and two treated groups with 5% (T2) and 10% (T3) of ERT in the ration, with five replicates per treatment. Thirty non-castrated male pigs (York-Duroc-Landrace) of 45 days of age were used. Feeds for the growing and finishing phase were formulated to be similar in protein (CP) and energy (ME) content (growing: 16.0% CP and 3.20 Mcal ME/kg and finishing: 13.0% CP and 3.20 Mcal ME/kg) and were administered ad libitum during 98 days. Body weight, feed intake and feed conversion rate were determined at 56 and 98 days. In addition, a sensory test of meat was carried out at the end of the study to evaluate the taste of the meat. The results at day 98 showed no differences between treatments on body weight (69.8, 81.3 and 86.4 kg for T1, T2 and T3 respectively) and feed intake (1.30, 1.50 and 1.54 kg/day for T1, T2 and T3 respectively). However, feed conversion improved when ERT was added to the ration (2.25, 2.15 and 2.04 for T1, T2 and T3 respectively, p=0.012). The sensorial evaluation indicated that ERT inclusion in feed did not affect the taste of the meat. In conclusion, the inclusion up to 10% of ERT in pig feed improves feed conversion and do not affect the taste of meat.Con la finalidad de determinar el efecto del nivel de inclusión de ensilado de residuos de trucha (ERT) en el alimento sobre el peso vivo, consumo de alimento y conversión alimenticia en cerdos, así como en el sabor de su carne, se plantearon tres tratamientos: un testigo (T1, 0%) y dos con niveles de 5% (T2) y 10% (T3) de inclusión de ERT en la ración, donde cada tratamiento se hizo con cinco réplicas. Se utilizaron 30 cerdos machos enteros de 45 días de edad (York-Duroc-Landrace). Los alimentos de crecimiento y engorde fueron similares en proteína (PB) y energía metabolizable (EM) (crecimiento: 16.0% PB y 3.20 Mcal/kg EM y engorde: 13.0% PB y 3.20 Mcal/kg EM) y fueron administrados ad libitum durante 98 días. Se determinó el peso vivo, el consumo de alimento y la conversión alimenticia a los 56 y 98 días. Al final se realizó una prueba sensorial para evaluar el sabor de la carne. A los 98 días, los resultados indicaron que los tratamientos T1, T2 y T3 no afectaron el peso vivo (69.8, 81.3 y 86.4 kg, respectivamente), ni el consumo de alimento (1.30, 1.50 y 1.54 kg/día, respectivamente). Sin embargo, la conversión alimenticia fue mejor con el incremento del ERT en la ración (2.25, 2.15 y 2.04 para T1, T2 y T3, respectivamente, p=0.012). Las calificaciones de la prueba sensorial indicaron que la inclusión de ERT en el alimento no afectó el sabor de la carne. Se concluye que hasta 10% de inclusión de ERT en el alimento mejora la conversión alimenticia y no afecta el sabor de la carne de los cerdos.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2017-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1305510.15381/rivep.v28i2.13055Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2017); 265-274Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2017); 265-2741682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13055/11911Derechos de autor 2017 Víctor Calderón-Quispe, Marisol Churacutipa-Mamani, Alberto Salas, Maritza Barriga-Sánchez, Marcelino J. Araníbarhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/130552017-09-04T16:08:14Z
score 13.919782
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).