Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To assess the role of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetusespresenting with isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM) in the ultrasound (US) evaluationof the fetal brain. Methods: US and MRI findings of 197 fetuses diagnosed withIVM between November 2018 and November 2020 were retrospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Omeroglu, Ibrahim, Golbasi, Hakan, Sever, Baris, Golbasi, Ceren, Oztekin, Deniz, Oztekin, Ozgur, Ekin, Atalay
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2473
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Fetal brain
Fetal ultrasound
Hydrocephalus
Cerebro fetal
Ecografía fetal
Resonancia magnética
Hidrocefalia
id REVSPOG_cd4451ea4b49d5ce35034194456e4221
oai_identifier_str oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2473
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
¿Podría contribuir la resonancia magnética a detectar la ventriculomegalia fetal aislada aparte de otras anormalidades?
title Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
spellingShingle Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
Omeroglu, Ibrahim
Fetal brain
Fetal ultrasound
Hydrocephalus
Cerebro fetal
Ecografía fetal
Resonancia magnética
Hidrocefalia
title_short Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
title_full Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
title_fullStr Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
title_full_unstemmed Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
title_sort Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Omeroglu, Ibrahim
Golbasi, Hakan
Sever, Baris
Golbasi, Ceren
Oztekin, Deniz
Oztekin, Ozgur
Ekin, Atalay
author Omeroglu, Ibrahim
author_facet Omeroglu, Ibrahim
Golbasi, Hakan
Sever, Baris
Golbasi, Ceren
Oztekin, Deniz
Oztekin, Ozgur
Ekin, Atalay
author_role author
author2 Golbasi, Hakan
Sever, Baris
Golbasi, Ceren
Oztekin, Deniz
Oztekin, Ozgur
Ekin, Atalay
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fetal brain
Fetal ultrasound
Hydrocephalus
Cerebro fetal
Ecografía fetal
Resonancia magnética
Hidrocefalia
topic Fetal brain
Fetal ultrasound
Hydrocephalus
Cerebro fetal
Ecografía fetal
Resonancia magnética
Hidrocefalia
description Objective: To assess the role of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetusespresenting with isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM) in the ultrasound (US) evaluationof the fetal brain. Methods: US and MRI findings of 197 fetuses diagnosed withIVM between November 2018 and November 2020 were retrospectively evaluated.Fetuses with abnormal karyotypes, additional anomalies, or known etiologies forventriculomegaly were excluded. US and MRI findings were compared both in termsof mean ventricular measurements and IVM grade. Results: MRI measurementswere significantly higher in mild IMV (10.33 ± 0.38 mm vs. 11.11 ± 0.51 mm, p<0.001) compared to US. In mild IVM, MRI measured ventricles larger than US witha mean difference of 0.78 mm. There was no significant difference in US and MRImeasurements in terms of mean values in moderate and severe IVM. There wasgood agreement between US and MRI in detecting right, left and mean IVM severity(Κ=0.265, Κ=0.324, and Κ=0.261, respectively). Linear regression analyses revealeda statistically significant relationship between US and MRI measurements of theright, left, and mean IVM (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). MRI showedperfect agreement with US in detecting IVM laterality (Κ=1.0, p<0.001). Conclusions:In fetuses with mild IVM detected by US, fetal brain MRI evaluation should beconsidered for accurate diagnosis. This approach may provide effective strategies inthe antenatal management and counseling of these pregnancies.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473
10.31403/rpgo.v69i2473
url https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v69i2473
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473/2704
https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473/2705
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 69 No. 1 (2023)
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 69 Núm. 1 (2023)
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868078737243766784
spelling Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?¿Podría contribuir la resonancia magnética a detectar la ventriculomegalia fetal aislada aparte de otras anormalidades?Omeroglu, Ibrahim Golbasi, HakanSever, Baris Golbasi, Ceren Oztekin, Deniz Oztekin, Ozgur Ekin, Atalay Fetal brainFetal ultrasoundHydrocephalusCerebro fetalEcografía fetalResonancia magnéticaHidrocefaliaObjective: To assess the role of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetusespresenting with isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM) in the ultrasound (US) evaluationof the fetal brain. Methods: US and MRI findings of 197 fetuses diagnosed withIVM between November 2018 and November 2020 were retrospectively evaluated.Fetuses with abnormal karyotypes, additional anomalies, or known etiologies forventriculomegaly were excluded. US and MRI findings were compared both in termsof mean ventricular measurements and IVM grade. Results: MRI measurementswere significantly higher in mild IMV (10.33 ± 0.38 mm vs. 11.11 ± 0.51 mm, p<0.001) compared to US. In mild IVM, MRI measured ventricles larger than US witha mean difference of 0.78 mm. There was no significant difference in US and MRImeasurements in terms of mean values in moderate and severe IVM. There wasgood agreement between US and MRI in detecting right, left and mean IVM severity(Κ=0.265, Κ=0.324, and Κ=0.261, respectively). Linear regression analyses revealeda statistically significant relationship between US and MRI measurements of theright, left, and mean IVM (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). MRI showedperfect agreement with US in detecting IVM laterality (Κ=1.0, p<0.001). Conclusions:In fetuses with mild IVM detected by US, fetal brain MRI evaluation should beconsidered for accurate diagnosis. This approach may provide effective strategies inthe antenatal management and counseling of these pregnancies.Objetivo. Determinar el papel de la resonancia magnética (RM) cerebral en fetos quepresentan ventriculomegalia aislada (VMA) en la evaluación ecográfica del cerebrofetal. Métodos. Se evaluaron retrospectivamente los hallazgos por ecografía y RM de197 fetos diagnosticados con VMA entre noviembre de 2018 y noviembre de 2020.Se excluyeron los fetos con cariotipos anormales, anomalías adicionales o etiologíasrelacionadas a ventriculomegalia. Se comparó los resultados de ecografía y RM tantoen términos de medidas ventriculares medias como de grado de VMA. Resultados.Las mediciones de la RM fueron significativamente mayores en la VMA leve(10,33±0,38 mm frente a 11,11±0,51 mm, p<0,001) en comparación con la ecografía.En la VMA leve, la RM midió los ventrículos más anchos que la ecografía, con unadiferencia media de 0,78 mm. No hubo diferencias significativas en las medicionespor ecografía y RM en cuanto a los valores medios de la VMA moderada y grave. Hubobuena concordancia entre la ecografía y la RM en la detección de la gravedad de laVMA derecha, izquierda y la media (Κ=0,265, Κ=0,324 y Κ=0,261, respectivamente).Los análisis de regresión lineal revelaron una relación estadísticamente significativaentre las mediciones de ecografía y RM de la VMA derecha, izquierda y la media(p<0,001, p<0,001 y p<0,001, respectivamente). La RM mostró una concordanciaperfecta con la ecografía en detectar la lateralidad de la VMA (Κ=1,0, p<0,001).Conclusiones. En fetos con VMA leve detectada por ecografía se debe considerarla evaluación por RM del cerebro fetal para un diagnóstico preciso. Este enfoquepuede proporcionar una estrategia eficaz en el manejo prenatal y el asesoramientode estos embarazos.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2023-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/247310.31403/rpgo.v69i2473The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 69 No. 1 (2023)Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 69 Núm. 1 (2023)2304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspaenghttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473/2704https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473/2705Derechos de autor 2023 Ibrahim Omeroglu, Hakan Golbasi, Baris Sever, Ceren Golbasi, Deniz Oztekin, Ozgur Oztekin, Atalay Ekinhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/24732026-01-12T15:21:11Z
score 13.411838
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).