Could magnetic resonance imaging contribute to detecting isolated fetal ventriculomegaly other than additional abnormalities?

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To assess the role of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetusespresenting with isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM) in the ultrasound (US) evaluationof the fetal brain. Methods: US and MRI findings of 197 fetuses diagnosed withIVM between November 2018 and November 2020 were retrospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Omeroglu, Ibrahim, Golbasi, Hakan, Sever, Baris, Golbasi, Ceren, Oztekin, Deniz, Oztekin, Ozgur, Ekin, Atalay
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2473
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2473
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Fetal brain
Fetal ultrasound
Hydrocephalus
Cerebro fetal
Ecografía fetal
Resonancia magnética
Hidrocefalia
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To assess the role of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetusespresenting with isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM) in the ultrasound (US) evaluationof the fetal brain. Methods: US and MRI findings of 197 fetuses diagnosed withIVM between November 2018 and November 2020 were retrospectively evaluated.Fetuses with abnormal karyotypes, additional anomalies, or known etiologies forventriculomegaly were excluded. US and MRI findings were compared both in termsof mean ventricular measurements and IVM grade. Results: MRI measurementswere significantly higher in mild IMV (10.33 ± 0.38 mm vs. 11.11 ± 0.51 mm, p<0.001) compared to US. In mild IVM, MRI measured ventricles larger than US witha mean difference of 0.78 mm. There was no significant difference in US and MRImeasurements in terms of mean values in moderate and severe IVM. There wasgood agreement between US and MRI in detecting right, left and mean IVM severity(Κ=0.265, Κ=0.324, and Κ=0.261, respectively). Linear regression analyses revealeda statistically significant relationship between US and MRI measurements of theright, left, and mean IVM (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). MRI showedperfect agreement with US in detecting IVM laterality (Κ=1.0, p<0.001). Conclusions:In fetuses with mild IVM detected by US, fetal brain MRI evaluation should beconsidered for accurate diagnosis. This approach may provide effective strategies inthe antenatal management and counseling of these pregnancies.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).