The discipline and effectiveness of the opposition groups in Parliament in the cases of interpellations during the governments of Toledo, Humala and García (2001-2013)

Descripción del Articulo

This article discusses the use of the mechanism of parliamentary control of interpellation to ministers in the Peruvian case, with the objective of stablish which factors determine the effectives of opposition groups to approve the motions of interpellations they present during the post- Fujimori go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vela, Estelí, Ruiz, Gabriela, García, Sebastián, Roca, Pablo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2014
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/13883
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/politai/article/view/13883
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:mechanisms of parliamentary control
Interpellation
opposition groups
parliamentary discipline
Legislative Voting
Executive Control and Legislative Success
Mecanismos de Control político
Interpelación
bancadas de oposición
disciplina parlamentaria
Control del Ejecutivo y efectividad Legislativa
Descripción
Sumario:This article discusses the use of the mechanism of parliamentary control of interpellation to ministers in the Peruvian case, with the objective of stablish which factors determine the effectives of opposition groups to approve the motions of interpellations they present during the post- Fujimori goverrnments of Alejandro Toledo, Alan García and Ollanta Humala (2001-2013). Taking into account the size, discipline and the number of motions presented, this research argues that the most effective parliamentary groups have high levels of discipline and present a reasonable number of motions, in relation to their capacity to approve them. The levels of discipline and effectiveness of each parliamentary group were calculate through the recompilation ofdata from 85 motions and 36 debates about the admission of the process.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).