Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Ho...
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
Institución: | Colegio Médico del Perú |
Repositorio: | Acta Médica Peruana |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2904 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Geriatric Assessment Neoplasms Early Detection of Cancer Sensitivity and Specificity Frailty Area Under Curve |
id |
REVCMP_8b7c88d99ee28618ed78dc9df73b1591 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2904 |
network_acronym_str |
REVCMP |
network_name_str |
Acta Médica Peruana |
repository_id_str |
. |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer Evaluación del test G8 como tamizaje para Valoración geriátrica integral en pacientes adultos mayores con cáncer |
title |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer Oscanoa, Teodoro J. Geriatric Assessment Neoplasms Early Detection of Cancer Sensitivity and Specificity Frailty Area Under Curve |
title_short |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer |
title_full |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Oscanoa, Teodoro J. Cieza-Macedo, Edwin Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia Amado-Tineo, Jose |
author |
Oscanoa, Teodoro J. |
author_facet |
Oscanoa, Teodoro J. Cieza-Macedo, Edwin Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia Amado-Tineo, Jose |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cieza-Macedo, Edwin Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia Amado-Tineo, Jose |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Geriatric Assessment Neoplasms Early Detection of Cancer Sensitivity and Specificity Frailty Area Under Curve |
topic |
Geriatric Assessment Neoplasms Early Detection of Cancer Sensitivity and Specificity Frailty Area Under Curve |
description |
Objective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Hospital in Lima, Peru. CGA reports were reviewed in the electronic medical records of older adults (> 60 years) with cancer, both outpatients and inpatients, between November 2022 and July 2023. Patients were classified according to the SIOG-1 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) criteria into two groups: fit and non-fit patients (vulnerable + frail + too sick). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were estimated for the G8 test. Results: 201 patients entered the study, 91 women (45.3%) and 110 (54.7%) men; their mean age was 76.2 ± 7.4 years. The most frequent neoplasms were colorectal, stomach, prostate, and bile ducts. The prevalence of eligible and unfit patients was 23.4% and 76.6%, respectively. When the G8 test score was ≤11, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC were 73.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 65.7- 80.2%), 91.5% (79.6%-97.6%), 96.6% (91.7-98.6%), and 89% (84-93%), respectively. Conclusions: The G8 test with a score ≤11 would have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying vulnerable or frail patients with cancer who could benefit from the CGA. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904 10.35663/amp.2024.411.2904 |
url |
https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35663/amp.2024.411.2904 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1600 https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1620 https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1648 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 ACTA MEDICA PERUANA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 ACTA MEDICA PERUANA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colegio Médico del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colegio Médico del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol 41 No 1 (2024): January - March ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 41 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero - Marzo 1728-5917 1018-8800 reponame:Acta Médica Peruana instname:Colegio Médico del Perú instacron:CMP |
instname_str |
Colegio Médico del Perú |
instacron_str |
CMP |
institution |
CMP |
reponame_str |
Acta Médica Peruana |
collection |
Acta Médica Peruana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1816075113374679040 |
spelling |
Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancerEvaluación del test G8 como tamizaje para Valoración geriátrica integral en pacientes adultos mayores con cáncerOscanoa, Teodoro J.Cieza-Macedo, EdwinLeon-Curiñaupa, SilviaAmado-Tineo, JoseGeriatric AssessmentNeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerSensitivity and SpecificityFrailtyArea Under CurveObjective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Hospital in Lima, Peru. CGA reports were reviewed in the electronic medical records of older adults (> 60 years) with cancer, both outpatients and inpatients, between November 2022 and July 2023. Patients were classified according to the SIOG-1 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) criteria into two groups: fit and non-fit patients (vulnerable + frail + too sick). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were estimated for the G8 test. Results: 201 patients entered the study, 91 women (45.3%) and 110 (54.7%) men; their mean age was 76.2 ± 7.4 years. The most frequent neoplasms were colorectal, stomach, prostate, and bile ducts. The prevalence of eligible and unfit patients was 23.4% and 76.6%, respectively. When the G8 test score was ≤11, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC were 73.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 65.7- 80.2%), 91.5% (79.6%-97.6%), 96.6% (91.7-98.6%), and 89% (84-93%), respectively. Conclusions: The G8 test with a score ≤11 would have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying vulnerable or frail patients with cancer who could benefit from the CGA.Objetivo: evaluar la sensibilidad y especificidad del test G8 en el tamizaje de adultos mayores con cáncer para la realización de la valoración geriátrica integral (VGI). Materiales y métodos: el presente estudio observacional y retrospectivo se realizó en el Servicio de Geriatría del Hospital Almenara de Lima, Perú. Se revisaron los informes de VGI en las historias clínicas electrónicos de adultos mayores (> 60 años) con cáncer, ambulatorios y hospitalizados, durante noviembre de 2022 y julio de 2023. Los pacientes se clasificaron según los criterios SIOG-1 (Sociedad Internacional de Oncología Geriátrica), formando dos grupos: pacientes aptos y pacientes no aptos o unfit (vulnerables + frágiles + muy enfermos). Del test G8 se estimó la sensibilidad, especificidad y valor predictivo positivo, área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor (AUC). Resultados: ingresaron al estudio 201 pacientes, 91 mujeres (45,3%) y 110 (54,7%) varones, la media de la edad fue de 76,2 ± 7,4 años. Las neoplasias más frecuentes fueron colorrectal, estómago, próstata y vías biliares. La prevalencia de pacientes aptos y no aptos (unfit) fue del 23,4 y 76,6%, respectivamente. Cuando el puntaje de la prueba G8 fue ≤11, la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y AUC fueron 73,4% (intervalo de confianza al 95%: 65,7-80,2%), 91,5% (79,6%-97,6%), 96,6% (91,7-98,6%) y 89% (84-93%), respectivamente. Conclusiones: el test G8 con puntaje ≤11 tendría una alta sensibilidad y especificidad, para identificar adultos con cáncer vulnerables o frágiles, que podrían beneficiarse de la VGI.Colegio Médico del Perú2024-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/290410.35663/amp.2024.411.2904ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol 41 No 1 (2024): January - MarchACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 41 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero - Marzo1728-59171018-8800reponame:Acta Médica Peruanainstname:Colegio Médico del Perúinstacron:CMPspahttps://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1600https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1620https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1648Copyright (c) 2024 ACTA MEDICA PERUANAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29042024-11-18T07:47:48Z |
score |
13.949927 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).