Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Oscanoa, Teodoro J., Cieza-Macedo, Edwin, Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia, Amado-Tineo, Jose
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Colegio Médico del Perú
Repositorio:Acta Médica Peruana
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2904
Enlace del recurso:https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Geriatric Assessment
Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Sensitivity and Specificity
Frailty
Area Under Curve
id REVCMP_8b7c88d99ee28618ed78dc9df73b1591
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2904
network_acronym_str REVCMP
network_name_str Acta Médica Peruana
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
Evaluación del test G8 como tamizaje para Valoración geriátrica integral en pacientes adultos mayores con cáncer
title Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
spellingShingle Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
Oscanoa, Teodoro J.
Geriatric Assessment
Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Sensitivity and Specificity
Frailty
Area Under Curve
title_short Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
title_full Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
title_sort Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Oscanoa, Teodoro J.
Cieza-Macedo, Edwin
Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia
Amado-Tineo, Jose
author Oscanoa, Teodoro J.
author_facet Oscanoa, Teodoro J.
Cieza-Macedo, Edwin
Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia
Amado-Tineo, Jose
author_role author
author2 Cieza-Macedo, Edwin
Leon-Curiñaupa, Silvia
Amado-Tineo, Jose
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Geriatric Assessment
Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Sensitivity and Specificity
Frailty
Area Under Curve
topic Geriatric Assessment
Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Sensitivity and Specificity
Frailty
Area Under Curve
description Objective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Hospital in Lima, Peru. CGA reports were reviewed in the electronic medical records of older adults (> 60 years) with cancer, both outpatients and inpatients, between November 2022 and July 2023. Patients were classified according to the SIOG-1 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) criteria into two groups: fit and non-fit patients (vulnerable + frail + too sick). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were estimated for the G8 test. Results: 201 patients entered the study, 91 women (45.3%) and 110 (54.7%) men; their mean age was 76.2 ± 7.4 years. The most frequent neoplasms were colorectal, stomach, prostate, and bile ducts. The prevalence of eligible and unfit patients was 23.4% and 76.6%, respectively. When the G8 test score was ≤11, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC were 73.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 65.7- 80.2%), 91.5% (79.6%-97.6%), 96.6% (91.7-98.6%), and 89% (84-93%), respectively. Conclusions: The G8 test with a score ≤11 would have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying vulnerable or frail patients with cancer who could benefit from the CGA.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904
10.35663/amp.2024.411.2904
url https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904
identifier_str_mv 10.35663/amp.2024.411.2904
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1600
https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1620
https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1648
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 ACTA MEDICA PERUANA
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 ACTA MEDICA PERUANA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colegio Médico del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colegio Médico del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol 41 No 1 (2024): January - March
ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 41 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero - Marzo
1728-5917
1018-8800
reponame:Acta Médica Peruana
instname:Colegio Médico del Perú
instacron:CMP
instname_str Colegio Médico del Perú
instacron_str CMP
institution CMP
reponame_str Acta Médica Peruana
collection Acta Médica Peruana
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1816075113374679040
spelling Evaluation of the G-8 test as a screening for comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancerEvaluación del test G8 como tamizaje para Valoración geriátrica integral en pacientes adultos mayores con cáncerOscanoa, Teodoro J.Cieza-Macedo, EdwinLeon-Curiñaupa, SilviaAmado-Tineo, JoseGeriatric AssessmentNeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerSensitivity and SpecificityFrailtyArea Under CurveObjective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Hospital in Lima, Peru. CGA reports were reviewed in the electronic medical records of older adults (> 60 years) with cancer, both outpatients and inpatients, between November 2022 and July 2023. Patients were classified according to the SIOG-1 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) criteria into two groups: fit and non-fit patients (vulnerable + frail + too sick). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were estimated for the G8 test. Results: 201 patients entered the study, 91 women (45.3%) and 110 (54.7%) men; their mean age was 76.2 ± 7.4 years. The most frequent neoplasms were colorectal, stomach, prostate, and bile ducts. The prevalence of eligible and unfit patients was 23.4% and 76.6%, respectively. When the G8 test score was ≤11, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC were 73.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 65.7- 80.2%), 91.5% (79.6%-97.6%), 96.6% (91.7-98.6%), and 89% (84-93%), respectively. Conclusions: The G8 test with a score ≤11 would have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying vulnerable or frail patients with cancer who could benefit from the CGA.Objetivo: evaluar la sensibilidad y especificidad del test G8 en el tamizaje de adultos mayores con cáncer para la realización de la valoración geriátrica integral (VGI). Materiales y métodos: el presente estudio observacional y retrospectivo se realizó en el Servicio de Geriatría del Hospital Almenara de Lima, Perú. Se revisaron los informes de VGI en las historias clínicas electrónicos de adultos mayores (> 60 años) con cáncer, ambulatorios y hospitalizados, durante noviembre de 2022 y julio de 2023. Los pacientes se clasificaron según los criterios SIOG-1 (Sociedad Internacional de Oncología Geriátrica), formando dos grupos: pacientes aptos y pacientes no aptos o unfit (vulnerables + frágiles + muy enfermos). Del test G8 se estimó la sensibilidad, especificidad y valor predictivo positivo, área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor (AUC). Resultados: ingresaron al estudio 201 pacientes, 91 mujeres (45,3%) y 110 (54,7%) varones, la media de la edad fue de 76,2 ± 7,4 años. Las neoplasias más frecuentes fueron colorrectal, estómago, próstata y vías biliares. La prevalencia de pacientes aptos y no aptos (unfit) fue del 23,4 y 76,6%, respectivamente. Cuando el puntaje de la prueba G8 fue ≤11, la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y AUC fueron 73,4% (intervalo de confianza al 95%: 65,7-80,2%), 91,5% (79,6%-97,6%), 96,6% (91,7-98,6%) y 89% (84-93%), respectivamente. Conclusiones: el test G8 con puntaje ≤11 tendría una alta sensibilidad y especificidad, para identificar adultos con cáncer vulnerables o frágiles, que podrían beneficiarse de la VGI.Colegio Médico del Perú2024-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/290410.35663/amp.2024.411.2904ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol 41 No 1 (2024): January - MarchACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 41 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero - Marzo1728-59171018-8800reponame:Acta Médica Peruanainstname:Colegio Médico del Perúinstacron:CMPspahttps://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1600https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1620https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/2904/1648Copyright (c) 2024 ACTA MEDICA PERUANAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29042024-11-18T07:47:48Z
score 13.949927
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).