Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study
Descripción del Articulo
This work was partially funded by the Dirección de Gestión de la Investigación at the PUCP, and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica del Perú (CONCYTEC from its acronym in Spanish), according to the Convenio de Gestión N° 232-2015-FONDECYT. We would also like to thank...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | objeto de conferencia |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2017 |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/794 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/794 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.056 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Undergraduate students Architectural design Construction industry Education Flowlines Project management Spreadsheets Students Turnaround time Construction Management Courses Critical path method Point-to-point relations Precedence relations Repetitive process TAKT time Teaching https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| id |
CONC_0acfa1a0a9c4976c30b6f3332e75e9dd |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/794 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONC |
| network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| repository_id_str |
4689 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| title |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| spellingShingle |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study Brioso X. Undergraduate students Architectural design Construction industry Education Flowlines Project management Spreadsheets Students Turnaround time Construction Management Courses Critical path method Critical path method Point-to-point relations Precedence relations Repetitive process TAKT time TAKT time Teaching https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| title_short |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| title_full |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| title_fullStr |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| title_sort |
Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study |
| author |
Brioso X. |
| author_facet |
Brioso X. Murguia D. Urbina A. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Murguia D. Urbina A. |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brioso X. Murguia D. Urbina A. |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Undergraduate students |
| topic |
Undergraduate students Architectural design Construction industry Education Flowlines Project management Spreadsheets Students Turnaround time Construction Management Courses Critical path method Critical path method Point-to-point relations Precedence relations Repetitive process TAKT time TAKT time Teaching https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Architectural design Construction industry Education Flowlines Project management Spreadsheets Students Turnaround time Construction Management Courses Critical path method Critical path method Point-to-point relations Precedence relations Repetitive process TAKT time TAKT time Teaching |
| dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00 |
| description |
This work was partially funded by the Dirección de Gestión de la Investigación at the PUCP, and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica del Perú (CONCYTEC from its acronym in Spanish), according to the Convenio de Gestión N° 232-2015-FONDECYT. We would also like to thank to Dilmer Dueñas, who kindly participated as instructor in the workshops. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/794 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.056 |
| dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85030464749 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/794 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.056 |
| identifier_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85030464749 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Procedia Engineering |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Ltd |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Ltd |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
| institution |
CONCYTEC |
| reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
| _version_ |
1839175659466784768 |
| spelling |
Publicationrp01910500rp02039600rp02040600Brioso X.Murguia D.Urbina A.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2017https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/794https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.0562-s2.0-85030464749This work was partially funded by the Dirección de Gestión de la Investigación at the PUCP, and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica del Perú (CONCYTEC from its acronym in Spanish), according to the Convenio de Gestión N° 232-2015-FONDECYT. We would also like to thank to Dilmer Dueñas, who kindly participated as instructor in the workshops.Over the last few years, Point-to-Point Precedence Relations (PTPPR) has emerged as a significant theme in the construction industry, indicating that point-to-point relations are better than Critical Path Method (CPM), both theoretically and practically. As the same time, research has focused on takt-time and flowlines. Both methods have been compared and integrated. This article presents strategies for teaching the integration of these popular methods in construction-management courses to undergraduate students of civil engineering at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. The case study is a community-house project that has highly repetitive processes in the structural works phase. First, we used traditional tools such as Excel spreadsheets and 2D drawings to teach production-system design with takt-time, flowlines, and PTPPR. Second, we used 3D and 4D models with Revit and Navisworks to integrate the previous takt-time schedule with a BIM model and identify its strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we used Vico Office for the automation of schedules and comparison of the methods in 4D and 5D. The article describes the lectures, workshops, and simulations employed, as well as feedback from students and instructors. The success of this teaching strategy is reflected in the survey responses from students and the opportunities for improvement identified.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengElsevier LtdProcedia Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUndergraduate studentsArchitectural design-1Construction industry-1Education-1Flowlines-1Project management-1Spreadsheets-1Students-1Turnaround time-1Construction Management Courses-1Critical path method-1Critical path method-1Point-to-point relations-1Precedence relations-1Repetitive process-1TAKT time-1TAKT time-1Teaching-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.00-1Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectreponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#20.500.12390/794oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/7942024-05-30 15:36:07.404http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="959828bb-11d0-4b22-a269-254fae1ea95b"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Procedia Engineering</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2017</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.056</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85030464749</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Brioso X.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp01910" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Murguia D.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp02039" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Urbina A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp02040" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Elsevier Ltd</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>Undergraduate students</Keyword> <Keyword>Architectural design</Keyword> <Keyword>Construction industry</Keyword> <Keyword>Education</Keyword> <Keyword>Flowlines</Keyword> <Keyword>Project management</Keyword> <Keyword>Spreadsheets</Keyword> <Keyword>Students</Keyword> <Keyword>Turnaround time</Keyword> <Keyword>Construction Management Courses</Keyword> <Keyword>Critical path method</Keyword> <Keyword>Critical path method</Keyword> <Keyword>Point-to-point relations</Keyword> <Keyword>Precedence relations</Keyword> <Keyword>Repetitive process</Keyword> <Keyword>TAKT time</Keyword> <Keyword>TAKT time</Keyword> <Keyword>Teaching</Keyword> <Abstract>Over the last few years, Point-to-Point Precedence Relations (PTPPR) has emerged as a significant theme in the construction industry, indicating that point-to-point relations are better than Critical Path Method (CPM), both theoretically and practically. As the same time, research has focused on takt-time and flowlines. Both methods have been compared and integrated. This article presents strategies for teaching the integration of these popular methods in construction-management courses to undergraduate students of civil engineering at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. The case study is a community-house project that has highly repetitive processes in the structural works phase. First, we used traditional tools such as Excel spreadsheets and 2D drawings to teach production-system design with takt-time, flowlines, and PTPPR. Second, we used 3D and 4D models with Revit and Navisworks to integrate the previous takt-time schedule with a BIM model and identify its strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we used Vico Office for the automation of schedules and comparison of the methods in 4D and 5D. The article describes the lectures, workshops, and simulations employed, as well as feedback from students and instructors. The success of this teaching strategy is reflected in the survey responses from students and the opportunities for improvement identified.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
| score |
13.439101 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
