El presente artículo pretende demostrar que el funcionario público jerárquicamente superior que incumple su deber de vigilancia es autor del delito de colusión en comisión por omisión. Para tal fin, identificamos que una conducta omisiva se corresponde en valor a una comisiva con el incumplimiento de un deber especial de garante. Constatamos que los delitos de infracción de deber atribuyen el título de autor a quien incumple este deber especial. Siguiendo tal encuadre, justificamos la posición de garante del funcionario superior que interviene en un procedimiento de contratación y detallamos el conjunto de obligaciones que dimanan de su deber de vigilancia. Siguiendo esa lógica, ponderamos el delito de colusión como un delito de infracción de deber y de mera actividad. Dicho análisis nos permitió concluir que el incumplimiento del deber ex ante del superior de acceder a in...

En medio del actual contexto de expansión de la criminalidad en el Perú, el presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la vinculación entre crimen organizado, corrupción y lavado de activos. Para ello, se abordan las características esenciales y tipologías del crimen organizado y la relación existente con los delitos de “cuello blanco” en el entorno peruano. Asimismo, se realiza un análisis crítico de la política criminal peruana frente a la criminalidad organizada de “cuello blanco”, con especial énfasis en la criminalización secundaria, advirtiendo una tendencia de “mano blanda” o de menor rigor del poder punitivo estatal ante este fenómeno.

In the midst of the current context of crime expansion in Peru, this article aims to analyze the link between organized crime, corruption and money laundering. To this end, the essential characteristics and typologies of organized crime and the relationship with “white collar” crimes in the Peruvian environment are addressed. Likewise, a critical analysis of Peruvian criminal policy in the face of “white collar” organized crime is carried out, with special emphasis on secondary criminalization, warning of a tendency of “soft hand” or less rigor of the state’s punitive power in the face of this phenomenon.

This article analyzes the nature of the crime of collusion regulated in article 384 of the Peruvian Penal Code, based on the recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice. The relationship between the illicit of the first paragraph of the aforementioned article -called “simple collusion”- and the second paragraph -called “aggravated collusion”, its protected objects and its nature of crimes of injury or danger will be examined. On this point, a critical analysis of some jurisprudential pronouncements will be made and a position will be adopted on the autonomous nature of both crimes in order to solve practical problems such as the moment of consummation of the crime, the attempt and criminal participation.

This article analyzes the nature of the crime of collusion regulated in article 384 of the Peruvian Penal Code, based on the recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice. The relationship between the illicit of the first paragraph of the aforementioned article -called “simple collusion”- and the second paragraph -called “aggravated collusion”, its protected objects and its nature of crimes of injury or danger will be examined. On this point, a critical analysis of some jurisprudential pronouncements will be made and a position will be adopted on the autonomous nature of both crimes in order to solve practical problems such as the moment of consummation of the crime, the attempt and criminal participation.

This article analyzes the nature of the crime of collusion regulated in article 384 of the Peruvian Penal Code, based on the recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice. The relationship between the illicit of the first paragraph of the aforementioned article -called “simple collusion”- and the second paragraph -called “aggravated collusion”, its protected objects and its nature of crimes of injury or danger will be examined. On this point, a critical analysis of some jurisprudential pronouncements will be made and a position will be adopted on the autonomous nature of both crimes in order to solve practical problems such as the moment of consummation of the crime, the attempt and criminal participation.