Sobre la naturaleza del delito de colusión del artículo 384 del Código Penal: Análisis del debate jurisprudencial

• Autores: Chanjan Documet, Rafael, Espinoza Marmolejo, Omar, Avendaño Cotrina, María Luisa, Santa María Alcázar, Felipe, Choque Moya, Alonzo, Gutiérrez Hinojosa, Lucrecia Samantha, Vega Malpartida, Adler Donnovan
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2022
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/193422
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/26281/24689; https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/26281/24704; https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/26281/24743; https://revistas.pucp; https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202202.006
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Colusión; Colusión agravada; Delitos de lesión; Delitos de peligro naturaleza autónoma; Consumación; Tentativa; Participación delictiva; Collusion; Aggravated collusion; Crimes of injury; Crimes of danger; Autonomous nature; Consummation; Attempt; Criminal participation; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00

This article analyzes the nature of the crime of collusion regulated in article 384 of the Peruvian Penal Code, based on the recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice. The relationship between the illicit of the first paragraph of the aforementioned article -called “simple collusion”- and the second paragraph -called “aggravated collusion”, its protected objects and its nature of crimes of injury or danger will be examined. On this point, a critical analysis of some jurisprudential pronouncements will be made and a position will be adopted on the autonomous nature of both crimes in order to solve practical problems such as the moment of consummation of the crime, the attempt and criminal participation.