Validity and factorial invariance of the general well-being index (Who-5 wbi) in peruvian university students [Validade e invariância fatorial do índice geral de bem-estar (Who-5 wbi) em universitários peruanos] [Validez e invariancia factorial del índice de bienestar general (Who-5 wbi) en universitarios peruanos]

• Autores: Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás, Ventura-León, José, Azabache-Alvarado, Karla, Reyes-Bossio, Mario, Cabrera-Orosco, Isabel
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Universidad Privada del Norte
• Repositorio: UPN-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.upn.edu.pe:11537/26639
• Enlace del recurso: https://hdl.handle.net/11537/26639; https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.9797
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Felicidad; Salud mental; Psicometría; Estudiantes universitarios; Perú; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.02

ABSTRACT Introduction: Owing to its importance in the development and evaluation of health policies in favor of the general population, there is currently a greater interest in the study of well-being. Therefore, a valid and reliable measurement of well-being is necessary. In this context, this study evaluated the evidence of validity based on the internal structure, reliability, and factor invariance by sex of the General WellBeing Index (who-5 wbi). Materials and Methods: A total of 499 university students (female = 271; male = 228) from the city of Trujillo, Peru, participated in the study. A confirmatory factor analysis, reliability by internal consistency, and factor invariance by sex were performed using a multigroup analysis. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 5-dimensional model with 5 correlated errors of items 1 and 4 presented a good fit (χ² = 9.667 [gl = 4], p > 0.05; χ²/gl = 2.416; cfi = 0.994; rmsea = 0.053 [ic90% 0.006–0.097]; srmr = 0.018). In addition, acceptable reliability (ω = 0.758) and factor invariance by sex were reported. Conclusion: The who-5 wbi demonstrated empirical evidence in favor of validity based on internal structure, reliability of scores, and factor invariance that allow for a useful and rapid instrument for measuring subjective well-being in university students.