Psychometric characteristics of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ) 13-item version for healthcare personnel in Peru
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To analyze the psychometric characteristics (validity and reliability) of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-13) 13-item version for healthcare personnel who were in face-to-face service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: An instrumental study was conducted in a non-pr...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
| Repositorio: | UPC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/686649 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://doi.org/10.35663/amp.2025.421.2793 http://hdl.handle.net/10757/686649 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Depression Mental Health Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ) Validation Study (Source: MeSH NLM) https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.00.00 |
| Sumario: | Objective: To analyze the psychometric characteristics (validity and reliability) of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-13) 13-item version for healthcare personnel who were in face-to-face service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: An instrumental study was conducted in a non-probabilistic sample including 4,179 Peruvian participants, mostly women (3,142, 75.2%), aged 20–59 years. The 13-item SRQ, which was implemented in the Technical Guide for Mental Health Care for Healthcare Personnel, was administered. Exploratory Graphic Analysis (EGA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to validate the internal structure; and McDonald's Omega was used to assess reliability. All analyses were performed using R Studio software. Results: We found a structure of four factors related to adequate adjusting indexes (TLI = 0.989, CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.026, 90% CI [0.022 - 0.029], and SRMR = 0.052); likewise, optimal reliability was reported when using the McDonald Omega coefficient in the following dimensions: somatic symptoms (ω = 0.82), anxiety symptoms (ω = 0.77), fatigue (ω = 0.83), and pathological sadness (ω = 0.84). Conclusions: The evidence supports the four-factor model for the SRQ-13, allowing valid and reliable evaluations for assessing somatic symptoms, anxiety, fatigue, and pathological sadness in Peruvian healthcare personnel; therefore, its use is recommended. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).