Quality model for educational mobile apps based on SQuaRE and AHP
Descripción del Articulo
During the last decade, there has been an increase in the demand of mobile apps in different download platforms, like Google Play Store, Apple App Store and Amazon App Store. Because of this, different approaches related to mobile app quality have surged, which tend to focus on assessing the general...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
Repositorio: | UPC-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/660096 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10757/660096 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso embargado |
Materia: | AHP Education Mobile apps Quality model SQuaRE |
Sumario: | During the last decade, there has been an increase in the demand of mobile apps in different download platforms, like Google Play Store, Apple App Store and Amazon App Store. Because of this, different approaches related to mobile app quality have surged, which tend to focus on assessing the general quality of an app without focusing on a specific sector. Because of this reason, the motivation to develop a quality model for mobile apps for the educational sector arises, using the System and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) guidelines and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) weighting technique; the latter was used to prioritize the quality attributes. A quality model has been obtained, which consists of 8 characteristics, 19 sub-characteristics and 30 metrics. In order to corroborate the proposed model, 4 research questions and 2 case studies related to 2 mobile apps have been established. The results proved that Google Classroom and Moodle have very similar scores in each assessed characteristic; in the case of Usability, there is a difference of 0.006 in favor of Moodle, for Portability, there is a difference of 0.150 in favor of Google Classroom, and for Security, regarding authentication rules and mechanisms, both apps obtained the same result. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).