Satisfacción con la enseñanza en odontología según los niveles de estudios de la Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To assess satisfaction with dental education according to the levels of study at the National University of the Peruvian Amazon. Method: This study is quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental, and prospective. Population: The population will consist of students from the IV, V, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Flores Marin, Alan Eduardo, Vilela Robalino, Jhon Alexander
Formato: tesis de grado
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad Nacional De La Amazonía Peruana
Repositorio:UNAPIquitos-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe:20.500.12737/10820
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/10820
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Odontología
Nivel de enseñanza
Satisfacción
Estudiantes de odontología
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To assess satisfaction with dental education according to the levels of study at the National University of the Peruvian Amazon. Method: This study is quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental, and prospective. Population: The population will consist of students from the IV, V, and VI levels of study at the School of Dentistry at the National University of the Peruvian Amazon. An estimated population of 132 students is calculated. Results: 5% (6 people): Rate their satisfaction with teaching performance as poor. 14% (19 people): Consider their satisfaction to be fair. 40% (53 people): Believe their satisfaction with teaching performance is good. 32% (42 people): Rate it as very good. 9% (12 people): Consider it excellent. Conclusion: The overall quality of teaching in the dentistry program is perceived predominantly positively by students, with a large majority rating it as "good" or "very good." However, there are areas for improvement, such as the clarity of course objectives and the accessibility of professors, which, although also positively valued, show some areas of dissatisfaction that could be optimized.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).