Estilos de liderazgo y acreditación en programas académicos universitarios

Descripción del Articulo

This study aimed to determine the relationship between leadership styles and accreditation progress, with organizational support as a mediating variable. A quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive-correlational design was employed. The sample consisted of 126 tenured professors holding administra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ramos Gómez, Juan Federico, Espinoza Montes, Isac Fernando
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2026
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:PUCP-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/206963
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/30809/28780
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/206963
https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202601.A013
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Leadership styles
Accreditation
Organizational support
Higher education
Estilos de liderazgo
Acreditación
Soporte organizacional
Estilos de liderazgo y acreditación
Estilos de liderança
Acreditação
Apoio organizacional
Ensino superior
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to determine the relationship between leadership styles and accreditation progress, with organizational support as a mediating variable. A quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive-correlational design was employed. The sample consisted of 126 tenured professors holding administrative or leadership positions across 21 faculties. The instruments used included the MLQ Leader Form questionnaire, the CEAI Organizational Support Assessment Instrument, and the Accreditation Progress Questionnaire. Content validity was established through expert judgment, with agreement assessed using Kendall’s W coefficient of concordance. Reliability was determined using Cronbach’s alpha. The findings indicate that organizational support plays a mediating role, strengthening the relationship between leadership styles and accreditation progress.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).