IMPLIED AUTHORIZATION? VIOLATION OF BANK SECRECY IN CONSUMER PROTECTION PROCEDURES THAT DEAL WITH PASSIVE OPERATIONS

Descripción del Articulo

Over the past few years, some Indecopi decision-making bodies specialized in consumer protection have requested information from various financial entities about the passive operations of complaining consumers, within the framework of a sanctioning administrative procedure. This requirement is legal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Huamán Núñez, Ayrton Erick, Damián Medina, Omar Alfredo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/2977
Enlace del recurso:https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/2977
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Descripción
Sumario:Over the past few years, some Indecopi decision-making bodies specialized in consumer protection have requested information from various financial entities about the passive operations of complaining consumers, within the framework of a sanctioning administrative procedure. This requirement is legally invalid, as it violates the pro hominem constitutional principle, the material truth principle and the consent principle in matters of personal data. However, if the financial entity provides said information in the context indicated above, it could not be penalized, since one of the exemptions from liability provided in the General Administrative Procedure Law would be configured.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).