Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
Descripción del Articulo
        In this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must fir...
              
            
    
                        | Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo | 
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 | 
| Institución: | Universidad Ricardo Palma | 
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma | 
| Lenguaje: | español | 
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4170 | 
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170 | 
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto | 
| Materia: | legal act legal business nullity none legal order validity ineffectiveness acto jurídico negocio jurídico nulidad inexistencia ordenamiento jurídico validez ineficacia | 
| id | REVURP_b5834336fc1439c88f15a5b499d211b8 | 
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str | oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4170 | 
| network_acronym_str | REVURP | 
| network_name_str | Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma | 
| repository_id_str |  | 
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) ¿Es útil la distinción entre nulidad e inexistencia en los negocios jurídicos? (Un análisis crítico sobre el ser y el no ser de los actos de autonomía privada) | 
| title | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) | 
| spellingShingle | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) Ninamancco Córdova, Fort legal act legal business nullity none legal order validity ineffectiveness acto jurídico negocio jurídico nulidad inexistencia ordenamiento jurídico validez ineficacia | 
| title_short | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) | 
| title_full | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) | 
| title_fullStr | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) | 
| title_full_unstemmed | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) | 
| title_sort | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy) | 
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Ninamancco Córdova, Fort | 
| author | Ninamancco Córdova, Fort | 
| author_facet | Ninamancco Córdova, Fort | 
| author_role | author | 
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | legal act legal business nullity none legal order validity ineffectiveness acto jurídico negocio jurídico nulidad inexistencia ordenamiento jurídico validez ineficacia | 
| topic | legal act legal business nullity none legal order validity ineffectiveness acto jurídico negocio jurídico nulidad inexistencia ordenamiento jurídico validez ineficacia | 
| description | In this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must first determine whether the business actually exists or not. Only existing businesses can be qualified as valid or invalid. After verifying whether the business is valid or invalid, it should analyze their effectiveness. It is noted, therefore, that the absence would be the first “condition” that could be noticed when trying to evaluate a transaction. In essence, there is talk of non-legally to designate “something” which, although presented in the reality of the facts, in the sense experience ¡s invaluable and invisible to the legal system primarily because there is no rule that somehow anticipated. However, rightly, it has argued that the classical notion of legal absence is inaccurate or misleading, being more convenient to speak of “legal irrelevance”. In this regard, it is noted that frowned things, for law is not so important that something actually exists or not, but the possibility that something to influence human interests. 1f these interests are taken into account by the system to provide a particular care or protection, that something will have legal significance, otherwise no. A phenomenon that affects interests that are indifferent to the system, no legal relevance. | 
| publishDate | 2021 | 
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2021-08-16 | 
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | 
| format | article | 
| status_str | publishedVersion | 
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170 10.31381/iusinkarri.vn4.4170 | 
| url | http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170 | 
| identifier_str_mv | 10.31381/iusinkarri.vn4.4170 | 
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa | 
| language | spa | 
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170/5100 | 
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2021 Fort Ninamancco Córdova https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | 
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2021 Fort Ninamancco Córdova https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | 
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess | 
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf | 
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado | 
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado | 
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Ius Inkarri; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2015); 113-136 2519-7274 2410-5937 10.31381/iusinkarri.vn4 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma instname:Universidad Ricardo Palma instacron:URP | 
| instname_str | Universidad Ricardo Palma | 
| instacron_str | URP | 
| institution | URP | 
| reponame_str | Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma | 
| collection | Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma | 
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |  | 
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |  | 
| _version_ | 1789625143382769664 | 
| spelling | Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)¿Es útil la distinción entre nulidad e inexistencia en los negocios jurídicos? (Un análisis crítico sobre el ser y el no ser de los actos de autonomía privada)Ninamancco Córdova, Fortlegal actlegal businessnullitynonelegal ordervalidityineffectivenessacto jurídiconegocio jurídiconulidadinexistenciaordenamiento jurídicovalidezineficaciaIn this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must first determine whether the business actually exists or not. Only existing businesses can be qualified as valid or invalid. After verifying whether the business is valid or invalid, it should analyze their effectiveness. It is noted, therefore, that the absence would be the first “condition” that could be noticed when trying to evaluate a transaction. In essence, there is talk of non-legally to designate “something” which, although presented in the reality of the facts, in the sense experience ¡s invaluable and invisible to the legal system primarily because there is no rule that somehow anticipated. However, rightly, it has argued that the classical notion of legal absence is inaccurate or misleading, being more convenient to speak of “legal irrelevance”. In this regard, it is noted that frowned things, for law is not so important that something actually exists or not, but the possibility that something to influence human interests. 1f these interests are taken into account by the system to provide a particular care or protection, that something will have legal significance, otherwise no. A phenomenon that affects interests that are indifferent to the system, no legal relevance.En el presente artículo se pretende diferenciar entre la nulidad e inexistencia del acto jurídico. Se reconocen tres planos para comprender la dinámica del negocio en la experiencia jurídica: la existencia, la validez y la eficacia. Así, antes de verificar si nos hallamos ante un negocio válido o inválido, debemos determinar previamente si el negocio existe realmente o no. Sólo los negocios existentes pueden recibir el calificativo de válido o inválido. Luego de verificar si el negocio es válido o inválido, cabe analizar su eficacia. Se nota, pues, que la inexistencia sería la primera “patología” que podría advertirse al pretender evaluar un negocio jurídico. En esencia, se habla de inexistencia-jurídica: para designar a “algo” que, si bien se presenta en la realidad de los hechos, en la experiencia sensible, resulta inapreciable o invisible para el sistema jurídico primordialmente porque no existe una norma que lo prevea de algún modo. Sin embargo, con razón, se ha sostenido que la noción clásica de inexistencia jurídica es imprecisa o equivoca, resultando más conveniente hablar de “irrelevancia jurídica”. En tal sentido, se señala que, bien vistas las cosas, para ordenamiento jurídico no es tan importante que algo efectivamente exista o no exista, sino la posibilidad de ese algo para incidir sobre intereses humanos. Si esos intereses son tomados en cuenta por el ordenamiento para brindarles una determinada tutela o protección, ese algo tendrá relevancia jurídica, de lo contrario no. Un fenómeno que afecta intereses que le son indiferentes al ordenamiento, no tiene relevancia jurídica.Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado2021-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/417010.31381/iusinkarri.vn4.4170Ius Inkarri; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2015); 113-1362519-72742410-593710.31381/iusinkarri.vn4reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palmainstname:Universidad Ricardo Palmainstacron:URPspahttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170/5100Derechos de autor 2021 Fort Ninamancco Córdovahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/41702023-10-14T15:35:04Z | 
| score | 13.932908 | 
 Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
    La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
 
   
   
             
            