Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)

Descripción del Articulo

In this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ninamancco Córdova, Fort
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4170
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:legal act
legal business
nullity
none
legal order
validity
ineffectiveness
acto jurídico
negocio jurídico
nulidad
inexistencia
ordenamiento jurídico
validez
ineficacia
id REVURP_b5834336fc1439c88f15a5b499d211b8
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4170
network_acronym_str REVURP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
¿Es útil la distinción entre nulidad e inexistencia en los negocios jurídicos? (Un análisis crítico sobre el ser y el no ser de los actos de autonomía privada)
title Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
spellingShingle Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
Ninamancco Córdova, Fort
legal act
legal business
nullity
none
legal order
validity
ineffectiveness
acto jurídico
negocio jurídico
nulidad
inexistencia
ordenamiento jurídico
validez
ineficacia
title_short Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
title_full Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
title_fullStr Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
title_full_unstemmed Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
title_sort Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ninamancco Córdova, Fort
author Ninamancco Córdova, Fort
author_facet Ninamancco Córdova, Fort
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv legal act
legal business
nullity
none
legal order
validity
ineffectiveness
acto jurídico
negocio jurídico
nulidad
inexistencia
ordenamiento jurídico
validez
ineficacia
topic legal act
legal business
nullity
none
legal order
validity
ineffectiveness
acto jurídico
negocio jurídico
nulidad
inexistencia
ordenamiento jurídico
validez
ineficacia
description In this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must first determine whether the business actually exists or not. Only existing businesses can be qualified as valid or invalid. After verifying whether the business is valid or invalid, it should analyze their effectiveness. It is noted, therefore, that the absence would be the first “condition” that could be noticed when trying to evaluate a transaction. In essence, there is talk of non-legally to designate “something” which, although presented in the reality of the facts, in the sense experience ¡s invaluable and invisible to the legal system primarily because there is no rule that somehow anticipated. However, rightly, it has argued that the classical notion of legal absence is inaccurate or misleading, being more convenient to speak of “legal irrelevance”. In this regard, it is noted that frowned things, for law is not so important that something actually exists or not, but the possibility that something to influence human interests. 1f these interests are taken into account by the system to provide a particular care or protection, that something will have legal significance, otherwise no. A phenomenon that affects interests that are indifferent to the system, no legal relevance.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170
10.31381/iusinkarri.vn4.4170
url http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170
identifier_str_mv 10.31381/iusinkarri.vn4.4170
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170/5100
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Fort Ninamancco Córdova
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Fort Ninamancco Córdova
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ius Inkarri; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2015); 113-136
2519-7274
2410-5937
10.31381/iusinkarri.vn4
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
instname:Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron:URP
instname_str Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron_str URP
institution URP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
collection Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789625143382769664
spelling Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)¿Es útil la distinción entre nulidad e inexistencia en los negocios jurídicos? (Un análisis crítico sobre el ser y el no ser de los actos de autonomía privada)Ninamancco Córdova, Fortlegal actlegal businessnullitynonelegal ordervalidityineffectivenessacto jurídiconegocio jurídiconulidadinexistenciaordenamiento jurídicovalidezineficaciaIn this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must first determine whether the business actually exists or not. Only existing businesses can be qualified as valid or invalid. After verifying whether the business is valid or invalid, it should analyze their effectiveness. It is noted, therefore, that the absence would be the first “condition” that could be noticed when trying to evaluate a transaction. In essence, there is talk of non-legally to designate “something” which, although presented in the reality of the facts, in the sense experience ¡s invaluable and invisible to the legal system primarily because there is no rule that somehow anticipated. However, rightly, it has argued that the classical notion of legal absence is inaccurate or misleading, being more convenient to speak of “legal irrelevance”. In this regard, it is noted that frowned things, for law is not so important that something actually exists or not, but the possibility that something to influence human interests. 1f these interests are taken into account by the system to provide a particular care or protection, that something will have legal significance, otherwise no. A phenomenon that affects interests that are indifferent to the system, no legal relevance.En el presente artículo se pretende diferenciar entre la nulidad e inexistencia del acto jurídico. Se reconocen tres planos para comprender la dinámica del negocio en la experiencia jurídica: la existencia, la validez y la eficacia. Así, antes de verificar si nos hallamos ante un negocio válido o inválido, debemos determinar previamente si el negocio existe realmente o no. Sólo los negocios existentes pueden recibir el calificativo de válido o inválido. Luego de verificar si el negocio es válido o inválido, cabe analizar su eficacia. Se nota, pues, que la inexistencia sería la primera “patología” que podría advertirse al pretender evaluar un negocio jurídico. En esencia, se habla de inexistencia-jurídica: para designar a “algo” que, si bien se presenta en la realidad de los hechos, en la experiencia sensible, resulta inapreciable o invisible para el sistema jurídico primordialmente porque no existe una norma que lo prevea de algún modo. Sin embargo, con razón, se ha sostenido que la noción clásica de inexistencia jurídica es imprecisa o equivoca, resultando más conveniente hablar de “irrelevancia jurídica”. En tal sentido, se señala que, bien vistas las cosas, para ordenamiento jurídico no es tan importante que algo efectivamente exista o no exista, sino la posibilidad de ese algo para incidir sobre intereses humanos. Si esos intereses son tomados en cuenta por el ordenamiento para brindarles una determinada tutela o protección, ese algo tendrá relevancia jurídica, de lo contrario no. Un fenómeno que afecta intereses que le son indiferentes al ordenamiento, no tiene relevancia jurídica.Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado2021-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/417010.31381/iusinkarri.vn4.4170Ius Inkarri; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2015); 113-1362519-72742410-593710.31381/iusinkarri.vn4reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palmainstname:Universidad Ricardo Palmainstacron:URPspahttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170/5100Derechos de autor 2021 Fort Ninamancco Córdovahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/41702023-10-14T15:35:04Z
score 13.932908
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).