Is the distinction between nullity and non-existence in legal business useful? (A critical analysis of being and not being of acts of private autonomy)

Descripción del Articulo

In this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ninamancco Córdova, Fort
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4170
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4170
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:legal act
legal business
nullity
none
legal order
validity
ineffectiveness
acto jurídico
negocio jurídico
nulidad
inexistencia
ordenamiento jurídico
validez
ineficacia
Descripción
Sumario:In this article we try to differentiate between annulment and non-existence of the measure. The existence, validity and effectiveness three levels to understand the dynamics of business legal experience are recognized. So, before checking if we are faced with a valid or invalid business, we must first determine whether the business actually exists or not. Only existing businesses can be qualified as valid or invalid. After verifying whether the business is valid or invalid, it should analyze their effectiveness. It is noted, therefore, that the absence would be the first “condition” that could be noticed when trying to evaluate a transaction. In essence, there is talk of non-legally to designate “something” which, although presented in the reality of the facts, in the sense experience ¡s invaluable and invisible to the legal system primarily because there is no rule that somehow anticipated. However, rightly, it has argued that the classical notion of legal absence is inaccurate or misleading, being more convenient to speak of “legal irrelevance”. In this regard, it is noted that frowned things, for law is not so important that something actually exists or not, but the possibility that something to influence human interests. 1f these interests are taken into account by the system to provide a particular care or protection, that something will have legal significance, otherwise no. A phenomenon that affects interests that are indifferent to the system, no legal relevance.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).