INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Descripción del Articulo

The purpose of the study was to evaluate research training for prospective and methodological learning in university students. The study was developed in April 2019 with students from the 10th cycle of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, belonging to the National University "San Luis Gonzaga"...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Argota-Pérez, George, Doroteo-Neyra, Pedro F., Chacaltana-Ramos, Luz Josefina, Peñaranda-Calle, César A., Roca-Vásquez, Karim L., Gutierres-Ramos, Edgar M., Velásquez Salcedo, Lida F.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/3442
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVURP_88f23517fb698e5f3c69bca672abcd04
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/3442
network_acronym_str REVURP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
FORMACIÓN INVESTIGATIVA PARA EL APRENDIZAJE PROSPECTIVO Y METODOLÓGICO EN ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS
title INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
spellingShingle INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Argota-Pérez, George
title_short INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_full INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_fullStr INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_full_unstemmed INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_sort INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Argota-Pérez, George
Doroteo-Neyra, Pedro F.
Chacaltana-Ramos, Luz Josefina
Peñaranda-Calle, César A.
Roca-Vásquez, Karim L.
Gutierres-Ramos, Edgar M.
Velásquez Salcedo, Lida F.
author Argota-Pérez, George
author_facet Argota-Pérez, George
Doroteo-Neyra, Pedro F.
Chacaltana-Ramos, Luz Josefina
Peñaranda-Calle, César A.
Roca-Vásquez, Karim L.
Gutierres-Ramos, Edgar M.
Velásquez Salcedo, Lida F.
author_role author
author2 Doroteo-Neyra, Pedro F.
Chacaltana-Ramos, Luz Josefina
Peñaranda-Calle, César A.
Roca-Vásquez, Karim L.
Gutierres-Ramos, Edgar M.
Velásquez Salcedo, Lida F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
description The purpose of the study was to evaluate research training for prospective and methodological learning in university students. The study was developed in April 2019 with students from the 10th cycle of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, belonging to the National University "San Luis Gonzaga", Ica-Peru. The trainin course "Thesis project and scientifi c research thesis for university students" was considered. The population sample was of 18 university students, and through non-probability sampling, by convenience (afternoons: Tuesday and Thursday), the number of attendance was measured, while the research training (FI) was measured on Thursday afternoon. The percentage of progress in the methodological structure of the thesis project was considered, where the following was established as a nominal qualitative criterion FOR the latter indicator: effi cient FI (100-85%), regular FI (84-75%), poor FI (less than 75%). For each day, a percentage of progress of the training course was indicated, and although only one student was absent, there was a statistically significant difference (t = -95.82) when compared to Tuesday (94.44 %) and Thursday (100%). According to the percentage of the advancement of the thesis project's methodological criteria, the FI was efficient since 15 students out of 18 complied with the established (83.33%). It is concluded that investigative training requires assistance during training and being offered by the teacher, dosed topics that allow the development and understanding of concepts and procedures. Keywords: concepts - evaluation - training - interpretation - procedures
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442
10.31381/paideia.v10i2.3442
url http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442
identifier_str_mv 10.31381/paideia.v10i2.3442
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442/4238
http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442/8285
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Paideia XXI
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Paideia XXI
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paideia XXI; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2020): PAIDEIA XXI; 407-415
Paideia XXI; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): PAIDEIA XXI; 407-415
2519-5700
2221-7770
10.31381/paideia.v10i2
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
instname:Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron:URP
instname_str Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron_str URP
institution URP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
collection Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789625154133819392
spelling INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE LEARNING AND METODOLOGIC IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTSFORMACIÓN INVESTIGATIVA PARA EL APRENDIZAJE PROSPECTIVO Y METODOLÓGICO EN ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOSArgota-Pérez, GeorgeDoroteo-Neyra, Pedro F.Chacaltana-Ramos, Luz JosefinaPeñaranda-Calle, César A.Roca-Vásquez, Karim L.Gutierres-Ramos, Edgar M.Velásquez Salcedo, Lida F.The purpose of the study was to evaluate research training for prospective and methodological learning in university students. The study was developed in April 2019 with students from the 10th cycle of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, belonging to the National University "San Luis Gonzaga", Ica-Peru. The trainin course "Thesis project and scientifi c research thesis for university students" was considered. The population sample was of 18 university students, and through non-probability sampling, by convenience (afternoons: Tuesday and Thursday), the number of attendance was measured, while the research training (FI) was measured on Thursday afternoon. The percentage of progress in the methodological structure of the thesis project was considered, where the following was established as a nominal qualitative criterion FOR the latter indicator: effi cient FI (100-85%), regular FI (84-75%), poor FI (less than 75%). For each day, a percentage of progress of the training course was indicated, and although only one student was absent, there was a statistically significant difference (t = -95.82) when compared to Tuesday (94.44 %) and Thursday (100%). According to the percentage of the advancement of the thesis project's methodological criteria, the FI was efficient since 15 students out of 18 complied with the established (83.33%). It is concluded that investigative training requires assistance during training and being offered by the teacher, dosed topics that allow the development and understanding of concepts and procedures. Keywords: concepts - evaluation - training - interpretation - proceduresEl propósito del estudio fue evaluar la formación investigativa para el aprendizaje prospectivo y metodológico en estudiantes universitarios. El estudio se desarrolló en abril de 2019 con estudiantes del 10mo ciclo de la Facultad de Ingeniería Civil, perteneciente a la Universidad Nacional "San Luis Gonzaga" de Ica, Perú. Se consideró, el curso de capacitación "Proyecto de tesina y tesis de investigación científica para estudiantes universitarios". La muestra poblacional fue de 18 estudiantes universitarios y mediante un muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia (tardes: martes y jueves) se midió el número de asistencia mientras que, la formación investigativa (FI) se midió el jueves en la tarde. Se consideró para este último indicador, el porcentaje de avance de la estructura metodológica del proyecto de tesis donde se estableció como criterio cualitativo nominal lo siguiente: eficiente FI (100-85%), regular FI (84-75%), deficiente FI (menos del 75%). Para cada día se indicó, un porcentaje de avance del curso de capacitación y aunque se ausentó solo un estudiante, hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa al compararse el día martes (94,44%) y jueves (100%). Según el porcentaje de avance de los criterios metodológicos del proyecto de tesis se describió como eficiente la FI, pues 15 estudiantes de 18 cumplieron con lo establecido (83,33%). Se concluye que, la formación investigativa requiere de la asistencia durante las capacitaciones, además, de ofrecerse por el docente, temas dosificados que permitan el desarrollo y comprensión de conceptos y procedimientos. Palabras clave: conceptos - evaluación - formación - interpretación - procedimientosUniversidad Ricardo Palma2020-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulo evaluado por paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/344210.31381/paideia.v10i2.3442Paideia XXI; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2020): PAIDEIA XXI; 407-415Paideia XXI; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): PAIDEIA XXI; 407-4152519-57002221-777010.31381/paideia.v10i2reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palmainstname:Universidad Ricardo Palmainstacron:URPspahttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442/4238http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Paideia/article/view/3442/8285Derechos de autor 2020 Paideia XXIinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/34422023-03-01T01:42:57Z
score 13.91977
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).