Evaluation Indicators for Citations and References in Master’s Thesis in Education: A Peruvian Sample
Descripción del Articulo
This research work is aimed at determining the quality of citations and references of the Master’s thesis in Education of peruvian colleges. The documental analysis technique was used and the “Observation Guide” proposed by Martín and Lafuente (2017) was employed as an instrument, which is...
Autores: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2019 |
Institución: | Universidad Peruana Unión |
Repositorio: | Revistas Universidad Peruana Unión |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/382 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/382 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Quality of citations quality of bibliographic references Master’s thesis educational research. Calidad de citas calidad de referencias bibliográficas tesis de maestría investigación educativa. |
Sumario: | This research work is aimed at determining the quality of citations and references of the Master’s thesis in Education of peruvian colleges. The documental analysis technique was used and the “Observation Guide” proposed by Martín and Lafuente (2017) was employed as an instrument, which is composed of five quality indicators for the bibliographic review (exhaustiveness, critical use of the bibliography, quality, relevance and review of previous research works); and of 9 for bibliographic references (update, number of references, self-citation, language, typology, support, complete references, accuracy and fulfillment of a standard or style). In addition, 562 bibliographic references and 1209 citations extracted from 14 theses, digitalized and published in the National Digital Repository of Peru during 2017, were analyzed. The mechanisms for citations as well as the bibliographic references were evaluated. After the descriptive-statistical analysis, it could be identified that the level achieved for both variables was “Enough”. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).