Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: to determine the socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursingprofessional who works in a private clinic in Lima. Methodology: It is a quantitative, correlational, crosssectionalstudy. The selection of the sample was made through non-probability sampling f...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unión |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.revistas.upeu.edu.pe:article/1347 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Quality of life, socio-labor factors, nursing. Calidad de vida, factores sociolaborales, enfermería. |
| id |
REVUPEU_31cb4b3a71f3234460a6dcb853f09527 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.upeu.edu.pe:article/1347 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUPEU |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unión |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 Factores sociolaborales asociados a la calidad de vida en el trabajo del profesional de enfermería que labora en una clínica privada, Lima, 2020 |
| title |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 |
| spellingShingle |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 Adanaqué Castillo, Jaqueline Quality of life, socio-labor factors, nursing. Calidad de vida, factores sociolaborales, enfermería. |
| title_short |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 |
| title_full |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 |
| title_fullStr |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 |
| title_sort |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020 |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Adanaqué Castillo, Jaqueline Reynoso Valdez, Aldeir Contreras Castro, Flor Lucila |
| author |
Adanaqué Castillo, Jaqueline |
| author_facet |
Adanaqué Castillo, Jaqueline Reynoso Valdez, Aldeir Contreras Castro, Flor Lucila |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Reynoso Valdez, Aldeir Contreras Castro, Flor Lucila |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of life, socio-labor factors, nursing. Calidad de vida, factores sociolaborales, enfermería. |
| topic |
Quality of life, socio-labor factors, nursing. Calidad de vida, factores sociolaborales, enfermería. |
| description |
Objective: to determine the socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursingprofessional who works in a private clinic in Lima. Methodology: It is a quantitative, correlational, crosssectionalstudy. The selection of the sample was made through non-probability sampling for convenienceand was made up of 109 nursing professionals. To collect data on socio-labor factors, a questionnaireprepared by the researchers was used and, to measure quality of life, the questionnaire “CVT-GOHISALO”proposed by, Pando, González, Aranda and Elizalde (2017) was used. Results: 76.1% of the nursingprofessionals present Average quality of life at work, 16.5% high, and 7.3% low. Regarding the associationof socio-labor factors and quality of life at work, it is found that 39.4% with low social support have lowquality of life, 26.6% with high social support have high quality of life; 50.5% with high discrimination havea low quality of life, 18.3% who do not suffer discrimination have a high quality of life; 56% who receivelow remuneration have low quality of life, 16.5% who receive high remuneration have high quality of life; 62.4% with poor employment conditions present low quality of life, 20.2% with optimal employmentconditions present high quality of life; 43.1% who perceive a poor work environment have a low qualityof life, and 24.8% who perceive an optimal work environment have a high quality of life. The socio-laborfactors that have the highest association with quality of life at work are: discrimination and employmentconditions with OR = 4,672 and OR = 9,087 respectively. Conclusion: there is a significant associationbetween socio-labor factors and the quality of life in the work of nursing professionals. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347 10.17162/rccs.v13i1.1347 |
| url |
https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.17162/rccs.v13i1.1347 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347/1688 https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347/1796 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana Unión |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020): Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; 59 - 66 Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; 59 - 66 2411-0094 2306-0603 10.17162/rccs.v13i1 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unión instname:Universidad Peruana Unión instacron:UPEU |
| instname_str |
Universidad Peruana Unión |
| instacron_str |
UPEU |
| institution |
UPEU |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unión |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unión |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1796961641012658176 |
| spelling |
Socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursing professional who works in a private clinic, Lima, 2020Factores sociolaborales asociados a la calidad de vida en el trabajo del profesional de enfermería que labora en una clínica privada, Lima, 2020Adanaqué Castillo, Jaqueline Reynoso Valdez, Aldeir Contreras Castro, Flor Lucila Quality of life, socio-labor factors, nursing.Calidad de vida, factores sociolaborales, enfermería.Objective: to determine the socio-labor factors associated with the quality of life at work of the nursingprofessional who works in a private clinic in Lima. Methodology: It is a quantitative, correlational, crosssectionalstudy. The selection of the sample was made through non-probability sampling for convenienceand was made up of 109 nursing professionals. To collect data on socio-labor factors, a questionnaireprepared by the researchers was used and, to measure quality of life, the questionnaire “CVT-GOHISALO”proposed by, Pando, González, Aranda and Elizalde (2017) was used. Results: 76.1% of the nursingprofessionals present Average quality of life at work, 16.5% high, and 7.3% low. Regarding the associationof socio-labor factors and quality of life at work, it is found that 39.4% with low social support have lowquality of life, 26.6% with high social support have high quality of life; 50.5% with high discrimination havea low quality of life, 18.3% who do not suffer discrimination have a high quality of life; 56% who receivelow remuneration have low quality of life, 16.5% who receive high remuneration have high quality of life; 62.4% with poor employment conditions present low quality of life, 20.2% with optimal employmentconditions present high quality of life; 43.1% who perceive a poor work environment have a low qualityof life, and 24.8% who perceive an optimal work environment have a high quality of life. The socio-laborfactors that have the highest association with quality of life at work are: discrimination and employmentconditions with OR = 4,672 and OR = 9,087 respectively. Conclusion: there is a significant associationbetween socio-labor factors and the quality of life in the work of nursing professionals.Objetivo: determinar los factores sociolaborales asociados a la calidad de vida en el trabajo delprofesional de enfermería que labora en una clínica privada de Lima. Metodologia: Es un estudiocuantitativo, correlacional, de corte transversal. La selección de la muestra se realizó mediante muestreono probabilístico por conveniencia y estuvo conformada por 109 profesionales de enfermería. Para larecolección de datos sobre los factores sociolaborales, se utilizó un cuestionario elaborado por losinvestigadores y, para medir la calidad de vida, se utilizó el cuestionario “CVT-GOHISALO” propuesto por,Pando, González, Aranda y Elizalde (2017). Resultados: el 76,1% de los profesionales de enfermeríapresenta Calidad de vida media en el trabajo, el 16,5% alta, y el 7,3% baja. En cuanto a la asociación delos factores sociolaborales y la calidad de vida en el trabajo se encuentra que el 39,4% con bajo apoyosocial presenta calidad de vida baja, el 26,6% con alto apoyo social presenta calidad de vida alta; el50,5% con alta discriminación, presenta calidad de vida baja, el 18,3% que no sufre discriminación tienecalidad de vida alta; el 56% que percibe baja remuneración presenta calidad de vida baja, el 16,5% quepercibe alta remuneración presenta calidad de vida alta; el 62,4% con deficientes condiciones de empleopresenta calidad de vida baja, el 20,2% con óptimas condiciones de empleo presenta calidad de vidaalta; el 43,1% que percibe deficiente clima laboral presenta calidad de vida baja, y el 24,8% que percibeun óptimo clima laboral presenta calidad de vida alta. Los factores sociolaborales que presentan mayorasociación con la calidad de vida en el trabajo son: la discriminación y las condiciones de empleo conOR=4,672 y OR=9,087 respectivamente. Conclusión: existe asociación significativa entre los factoressociolaborales y la calidad de vida en el trabajo de los profesionales de enfermería.Universidad Peruana Unión2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/134710.17162/rccs.v13i1.1347Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020): Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; 59 - 66Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud; 59 - 662411-00942306-060310.17162/rccs.v13i1reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Unióninstname:Universidad Peruana Unióninstacron:UPEUspahttps://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347/1688https://revistas.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/rc_salud/article/view/1347/1796info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.revistas.upeu.edu.pe:article/13472021-01-05T07:08:34Z |
| score |
13.9573765 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).