Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To validate a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried-out. The survey was built considering resident´s opinions on the satisfaction requirements of each program and the five components o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cabello, Emilio, Cabello, Almendra, Martínez, Melissa
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3943
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3943
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVUPCH_b8f47eae212a7da4fa09af1d45dfc00a
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/3943
network_acronym_str REVUPCH
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
Validación de una encuesta para medir la satisfacción de los médicos residentes sobre el programa de especialización en Lima, Perú
title Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
spellingShingle Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
Cabello, Emilio
title_short Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
title_full Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
title_fullStr Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
title_sort Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cabello, Emilio
Cabello, Almendra
Martínez, Melissa
author Cabello, Emilio
author_facet Cabello, Emilio
Cabello, Almendra
Martínez, Melissa
author_role author
author2 Cabello, Almendra
Martínez, Melissa
author2_role author
author
description Objective: To validate a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried-out. The survey was built considering resident´s opinions on the satisfaction requirements of each program and the five components of the SERVQUAL quality survey. A pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the degree of understanding of the questions and an expert evaluation was also performed before applying the survey. Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach´s alpha test and validity was evaluated with a multifactorial analysis. Descriptive statistics was applied, Chi square test with a p value <0.05 was  used. Results: 218 (82.0%) surveys were analyzed; 54.1% were females; 57.7% were younger than 30 years of age; 86.2% were of free position. Degree of understanding was 9.98 and time to complete the survey was 5.45 minutes. Cronbach´s alpha was 0.919. The factorial analysis of the five most important components of satisfaction explained 66.5% of the variance of the 22 questions. Overall satisfaction was 71.8%, reliability was 79.2%, ability to respond was 80.2%, security was 60.8%, empathy was 82.8% and tangible aspects was 55.9%. No difference by sex, age group, specialty and modality of admission was found. Conclusions: The survey tested showed to be reliable and valid to evaluate the satisfaction of residents to their programs and it is a useful tool to identify opportunities to improve the residency program.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed article
Artículo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3943
10.20453/rmh.v32i1.3943
url https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3943
identifier_str_mv 10.20453/rmh.v32i1.3943
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3943/4489
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Emilio Cabello, Almendra Cabello, Melissa Martínez
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Emilio Cabello, Almendra Cabello, Melissa Martínez
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2021): January - March; 12-19
Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 12-19
Revista Medica Herediana; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 12-19
1729-214X
1018-130X
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instacron:UPCH
instname_str Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
instacron_str UPCH
institution UPCH
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
collection Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846152843172511744
spelling Validation of a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, PeruValidación de una encuesta para medir la satisfacción de los médicos residentes sobre el programa de especialización en Lima, PerúCabello, EmilioCabello, AlmendraMartínez, MelissaObjective: To validate a survey aimed at measuring satisfaction of residents about a specialization program in Lima, Peru. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried-out. The survey was built considering resident´s opinions on the satisfaction requirements of each program and the five components of the SERVQUAL quality survey. A pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the degree of understanding of the questions and an expert evaluation was also performed before applying the survey. Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach´s alpha test and validity was evaluated with a multifactorial analysis. Descriptive statistics was applied, Chi square test with a p value <0.05 was  used. Results: 218 (82.0%) surveys were analyzed; 54.1% were females; 57.7% were younger than 30 years of age; 86.2% were of free position. Degree of understanding was 9.98 and time to complete the survey was 5.45 minutes. Cronbach´s alpha was 0.919. The factorial analysis of the five most important components of satisfaction explained 66.5% of the variance of the 22 questions. Overall satisfaction was 71.8%, reliability was 79.2%, ability to respond was 80.2%, security was 60.8%, empathy was 82.8% and tangible aspects was 55.9%. No difference by sex, age group, specialty and modality of admission was found. Conclusions: The survey tested showed to be reliable and valid to evaluate the satisfaction of residents to their programs and it is a useful tool to identify opportunities to improve the residency program.Objetivo: Validar una encuesta para medir el nivel de satisfacción de los médicos residentes sobre el programa de segunda especialización en un hospital público de Lima, Perú. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal. El nuevo constructo se elaboró considerando los requisitos de satisfacción según opinión de los residentes y los 5 componentes de calidad de la encuesta SERVQUAL. Previo a su aplicación, fue sometida a opinión de expertos y prueba piloto para evaluar el grado de entendimiento de las preguntas y tiempo para su aplicación. La confiabilidad se evaluó con el alfa de Cronbach y la validez de constructo mediante análisis factorial. Realizamos estadística descriptiva y Chi cuadrado considerando significativo p<0,05. Resultados: Se analizaron 218 (82,0%) encuestas.54,1% fueron del sexo femenino, 57,7% tenía edad ≤30 años, 86,2% era de plaza libre. El grado de entendimiento fue 9,98 y el tiempo de aplicación promedio fue 5,45 minutos. El alfa de Cronbach 0,919. Según el análisis factorial los 5 componentes principales de satisfacción explicaron el 65,5 % de la varianza de las 22 preguntas. La satisfacción global fue 71,8 %, fiabilidad 79,2%, capacidad de respuesta 80,2 %, seguridad 60,8%, empatía 82,8% y aspectos tangibles 55,9%. No se encontró diferencia significativa por género, grupo etario, modalidad de ingreso y especialidad. Conclusiones: La validación de la encuesta para medir satisfacción de los médicos residentes sobre el programa de segunda especialización demostró ser válida y confiable, constituyendo una herramienta útil para identificar las oportunidades de mejora para el perfeccionamiento continuo del programa de Residentado Médico.Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia2021-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed articleArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/394310.20453/rmh.v32i1.3943Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2021): January - March; 12-19Revista Médica Herediana; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 12-19Revista Medica Herediana; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 12-191729-214X1018-130Xreponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstacron:UPCHspahttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3943/4489Derechos de autor 2021 Emilio Cabello, Almendra Cabello, Melissa Martínezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/39432021-05-31T15:57:42Z
score 12.805912
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).