Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To compare in vitro the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bioactive bulk-fill resins versus bulk-fill composite resins. Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted with 48 blocks of three types of resin. Each block received a load of 500 g for 30 seconds a...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/6247 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | dureza polimerización resinas compuestas hardness polymerization composite resins polimerização resinas compostas |
| id |
REVUPCH_377c40211420d87e72ad653fba7375c2 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/6247 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUPCH |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins Comparación de las propiedades mecánicas y profundidad de curado de resinas compuestas bulk-fill y bioactivas Comparação das propriedades mecânicas e da profundidade de cura de resinas compostas bioativas e de bulk-fill |
| title |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins Ríos-Angulo, Carlos Manuel dureza polimerización resinas compuestas hardness polymerization composite resins dureza polimerização resinas compostas |
| title_short |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins |
| title_full |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins |
| title_sort |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resins |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ríos-Angulo, Carlos Manuel Ríos-Caro, Marco Cesar Ríos-Caro, Teresa Etelvina |
| author |
Ríos-Angulo, Carlos Manuel |
| author_facet |
Ríos-Angulo, Carlos Manuel Ríos-Caro, Marco Cesar Ríos-Caro, Teresa Etelvina |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Ríos-Caro, Marco Cesar Ríos-Caro, Teresa Etelvina |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
dureza polimerización resinas compuestas hardness polymerization composite resins dureza polimerização resinas compostas |
| topic |
dureza polimerización resinas compuestas hardness polymerization composite resins dureza polimerização resinas compostas |
| description |
Objective: To compare in vitro the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bioactive bulk-fill resins versus bulk-fill composite resins. Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted with 48 blocks of three types of resin. Each block received a load of 500 g for 30 seconds and was photopolymerized with a VALO® Cordless-Ultradent unit (1500 mW/cm2) for 4 seconds. Microhardness was evaluated using the Vickers hardness test, employing a calibrated LG® HV-1000 hardness tester. For statistical analysis, the Student's t-test and the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test were applied, considering statistical significance if p < 0.05. Results: The bioactive resin Beautifil® Bulk (BB) showed the highest microhardness, reaching a mean value of 55.1 VH (p < 0.01), followed by the resins Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCBF) with 44.9 VH and Tetric® N-Flow Bulk Fill (TNFBF) with 28.8 VH. The TNFBF bulk-fill resin showed the highest compressive strength, with a mean of 222.4 MPa (p < 0.01), compared to 173.5 MPa for the TNCBF moldable resin and 129.7 MPa for the flowable BB resin. All three resins achieved a homogeneous mean curing depth of 4.0 mm (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The BB bioactive resin showed greater microhardness compared to moldable and flowable bulk-fill resins, while the TNFBF flowable bulk-fill resin showed the highest compressive strength. All three resins had similar values in terms of curing depth. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-03-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247 10.20453/reh.v35i1.6247 |
| url |
https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.20453/reh.v35i1.6247 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247/6087 https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247/6259 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2025 Teresa Etelvina Rios Caro, Carlos Manuel Rios _Angulo, Marco Cesar Rios-Caro http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2025 Teresa Etelvina Rios Caro, Carlos Manuel Rios _Angulo, Marco Cesar Rios-Caro http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 35 No. 1 (2025): Enero-marzo; 47-55 Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2025): Enero-marzo; 47-55 Revista Estomatológica Herediana; v. 35 n. 1 (2025): Enero-marzo; 47-55 2225-7616 1019-4355 10.20453/reh.v35i1 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia instname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia instacron:UPCH |
| instname_str |
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| instacron_str |
UPCH |
| institution |
UPCH |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1846787106014232576 |
| spelling |
Comparison of the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bulk-fill and bioactive composite resinsComparación de las propiedades mecánicas y profundidad de curado de resinas compuestas bulk-fill y bioactivasComparação das propriedades mecânicas e da profundidade de cura de resinas compostas bioativas e de bulk-fillRíos-Angulo, Carlos ManuelRíos-Caro, Marco CesarRíos-Caro, Teresa Etelvinadurezapolimerizaciónresinas compuestashardnesspolymerizationcomposite resinsdurezapolimerizaçãoresinas compostasObjective: To compare in vitro the mechanical properties and depth of cure of bioactive bulk-fill resins versus bulk-fill composite resins. Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted with 48 blocks of three types of resin. Each block received a load of 500 g for 30 seconds and was photopolymerized with a VALO® Cordless-Ultradent unit (1500 mW/cm2) for 4 seconds. Microhardness was evaluated using the Vickers hardness test, employing a calibrated LG® HV-1000 hardness tester. For statistical analysis, the Student's t-test and the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test were applied, considering statistical significance if p < 0.05. Results: The bioactive resin Beautifil® Bulk (BB) showed the highest microhardness, reaching a mean value of 55.1 VH (p < 0.01), followed by the resins Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCBF) with 44.9 VH and Tetric® N-Flow Bulk Fill (TNFBF) with 28.8 VH. The TNFBF bulk-fill resin showed the highest compressive strength, with a mean of 222.4 MPa (p < 0.01), compared to 173.5 MPa for the TNCBF moldable resin and 129.7 MPa for the flowable BB resin. All three resins achieved a homogeneous mean curing depth of 4.0 mm (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The BB bioactive resin showed greater microhardness compared to moldable and flowable bulk-fill resins, while the TNFBF flowable bulk-fill resin showed the highest compressive strength. All three resins had similar values in terms of curing depth.Objetivo: Comparar in vitro las propiedades mecánicas y la profundidad de curado de resinas bioactivas bulk-fill frente a resinas compuestas bulk-fill. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio experimental in vitro con 48 bloques de tres tipos de resina. Cada bloque recibió una carga de 500 g durante 30 segundos, y se fotopolimerizó con una unidad VALO® Cordless-Ultradent (1500 mW/cm2) durante 4 segundos. La microdureza se evaluó mediante la prueba de dureza de Vickers, utilizando un durómetro calibrado LG® HV-1000. Para el análisis estadístico se aplicó la prueba t de Student y la prueba no paramétrica de Kruskal-Wallis, considerando significación estadística si p < 0,05. Resultados: La resina bioactiva Beautifil® Bulk (BB) registró la mayor microdureza, alcanzando un valor medio de 55,1 VH (p < 0,01), seguido de las resinas Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCBF), con 44,9 VH, y Tetric® N-Flow Bulk Fill (TNFBF), con 28,8 VH. La resina bulk-fill fluida TNFBF mostró la mayor resistencia a la compresión, con una media de 222,4 MPa (p < 0,01), frente a 173,5 MPa de la resina moldeable TNCBF y de 129,7 MPa de la resina fluida BB. Las tres resinas evaluadas alcanzaron una profundidad de curado media homogénea de 4,0 mm (p > 0,05). Conclusiones: La resina bioactiva BB demostró mayor microdureza en comparación con las resinas bulk-fill moldeable y fluida, mientras que la resina bulk-fill fluida TNFBF presentó la mayor resistencia a la compresión. Las tres resinas tuvieron valores similares en cuanto a la profundidad de curado.Objetivo: Comparar as propriedades mecânicas in vitro e a profundidade de cura das resinas bioativas bulk-fill com as resinas compostas bulk-fill. Materiais e Métodos: foi realizado um estudo experimental in vitro com 48 blocos de três tipos de resina. Cada bloco foi carregado com 500 g por 30 segundos e fotopolimerizado com uma unidade VALO® Cordless-Ultradent (1500 mW/cm2) por 4 segundos. A microdureza foi avaliada pelo teste de dureza Vickers, usando um testador de dureza LG® HV-1000 calibrado. Para a análise estatística, foram aplicados o teste t de Student e o teste não paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis, considerando a significância estatística se p < 0,05. Resultados: A resina bioativa Beautifil® Bulk (BB) apresentou a maior microdureza, com um valor médio de 55,1 VH (p < 0,01), seguida pelas resinas Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCBF) com 44,9 VH e Tetric® N-Flow Bulk Fill (TNFBF) com 28,8 VH. A resina bulk-fill fluida TNFBF apresentou a maior resistência à compressão, com uma média de 222,4 MPa (p < 0,01), em comparação com 173,5 MPa para a resina fundível TNCBF e 129,7 MPa para a resina fluida BB. Todas as três resinas avaliadas atingiram uma profundidade de cura média homogênea de 4,0 mm (p > 0,05). Conclusões: A resina BB bioativa demonstrou maior microdureza em comparação com as resinas bulk-fill moldáveis e fluidas, enquanto a resina bulk-fill fluida TNFBF apresentou a maior resistência à compressão. Todas as três resinas apresentaram valores semelhantes para a profundidade de cura.Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia2025-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/624710.20453/reh.v35i1.6247Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 35 No. 1 (2025): Enero-marzo; 47-55Revista Estomatológica Herediana; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2025): Enero-marzo; 47-55Revista Estomatológica Herediana; v. 35 n. 1 (2025): Enero-marzo; 47-552225-76161019-435510.20453/reh.v35i1reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstname:Universidad Peruana Cayetano Herediainstacron:UPCHspahttps://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247/6087https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6247/6259Derechos de autor 2025 Teresa Etelvina Rios Caro, Carlos Manuel Rios _Angulo, Marco Cesar Rios-Carohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.upch.edu.pe:article/62472025-07-04T21:33:35Z |
| score |
12.888917 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
