Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To evaluate the dentin-resin bond´s resistance (DRBR) of the adhesives Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) and Single Bond Universal (SBU) with its self-engraving possibility, in three different times of application. Methods. Experimental, comparative and crossectional in vitro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia, Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando, Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/16221
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM)
Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME)
id REVUNMSM_9d3c5fc664668ee1562e56377e92c02c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/16221
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
Resistencia adhesiva dentinaresina utilizando tres sistemas adhesivos a diferentes tiempos de aplicación. Estudio in vitro
title Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
spellingShingle Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia
Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM)
Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME)
title_short Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
title_full Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
title_fullStr Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
title_sort Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia
Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando
Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel
author Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia
author_facet Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia
Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando
Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel
author_role author
author2 Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando
Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM)
Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME)
topic Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM)
Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME)
description Objective. To evaluate the dentin-resin bond´s resistance (DRBR) of the adhesives Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) and Single Bond Universal (SBU) with its self-engraving possibility, in three different times of application. Methods. Experimental, comparative and crossectional in vitro study. We used nine human molars, obtaining 135 specimens of 1 mm2 approximately, forming nine study groups of 15 specimens for each group. The DRBR was measured through the Microtunsion test at a tensile force with an acceleration of 0.5mm/min until a fracture.The contrast of difference hypotheses was performed using the one-factor ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparisons, both at a confidence level of 95%. Results. After 10 seconds, significant differences were found between the OFL adhesive systems (25.78 ± 5.98 MPa) vs ASB2 (from 14.02 ± 3.06 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL vs SBU (14.36 ± 4.69 MPa) with p<0.001. At 20 seconds, between OFL (34.37 ± 6.03 MPa) and ASB2 (16.33 ± 3.02 MPa) at level p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (19.44 ± 5.98 MPa) with p<0.001. After 30 seconds, the same differences were found between OFL (37.6 ± 11.93 MPa) and ASB2 (16.62 ± 1.81 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (23.56) ± 7.3 MPa) with p<0.001. Conclusions. OFL presented greater DRBR compared to ASB2 and SBU in the three rubs; between ASB2 and SBU rubbing 10 s no difference was found, rubbing 20 s and 30 s SBU presented higher DRBR. In all three groups there was a significant increase in DRBR between 10 and 30 seconds.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221
10.15381/os.v22i2.16221
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/os.v22i2.16221
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221/14043
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019); 92-100
Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2019); 92-100
1609-8617
1560-9111
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238211993206784
spelling Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitroResistencia adhesiva dentinaresina utilizando tres sistemas adhesivos a diferentes tiempos de aplicación. Estudio in vitroArquíñego Garay, Ketty AmeliaDel Castillo Ayquipa, ArmandoWatanabe Velásquez, RómelDentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM)Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME)Objective. To evaluate the dentin-resin bond´s resistance (DRBR) of the adhesives Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) and Single Bond Universal (SBU) with its self-engraving possibility, in three different times of application. Methods. Experimental, comparative and crossectional in vitro study. We used nine human molars, obtaining 135 specimens of 1 mm2 approximately, forming nine study groups of 15 specimens for each group. The DRBR was measured through the Microtunsion test at a tensile force with an acceleration of 0.5mm/min until a fracture.The contrast of difference hypotheses was performed using the one-factor ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparisons, both at a confidence level of 95%. Results. After 10 seconds, significant differences were found between the OFL adhesive systems (25.78 ± 5.98 MPa) vs ASB2 (from 14.02 ± 3.06 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL vs SBU (14.36 ± 4.69 MPa) with p<0.001. At 20 seconds, between OFL (34.37 ± 6.03 MPa) and ASB2 (16.33 ± 3.02 MPa) at level p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (19.44 ± 5.98 MPa) with p<0.001. After 30 seconds, the same differences were found between OFL (37.6 ± 11.93 MPa) and ASB2 (16.62 ± 1.81 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (23.56) ± 7.3 MPa) with p<0.001. Conclusions. OFL presented greater DRBR compared to ASB2 and SBU in the three rubs; between ASB2 and SBU rubbing 10 s no difference was found, rubbing 20 s and 30 s SBU presented higher DRBR. In all three groups there was a significant increase in DRBR between 10 and 30 seconds.Objetivo. Evaluar la resistencia adhesiva dentina-resina (RADR) en adhesivos Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) y Single Bond Universal (SBU) en tres tiempos diferentes de aplicación. Métodos. Estudio experimental in vitro, se empleó nueve molares humanas obteniéndose, 135 especímenes de 1 mm2 aproximadamente conformando nueve grupos de estudio de 15 especímenes para cada grupo. La RADR se midió a través del test de microtensión a una fuerza de tracción con una aceleración de 0,5 mm/min hasta la fractura. El contraste de hipótesis de diferencia se realizó utilizando el test de ANOVA de un factor y comparaciones múltiples de Tukey, ambos a un nivel de confianza del 95%. Resultados. A los 10 segundos, se hallaron diferencias significativas entre los sistemas adhesivos OFL (25,78 ± 5,98 MPa) vs ASB2 (de 14,02 ± 3,06 MPa), p<0,001, así como entre OFL vs SBU (14,36 ± 4,69 MPa) con p<0,001. A los 20 segundos, entre OFL (34,37 ± 6,03 MPa) y ASB2 (16,33 ± 3,02 MPa), p<0,001, así como entre OFL y SBU (19,44 ± 5,98 MPa) con p<0,001. A los 30 segundos también se encontraron las mismas diferencias entre OFL (37,6 ± 11,93 MPa) y ASB2 (16,62 ± 1,81 MPa), p<0,001, así como entre OFL y SBU (23,56 ± 7,3 MPa) p<0,001. Conclusiones. Optibond FL presentó mayor RADR frente a ASB2 y SBU en los tres tiempos; entre ASB2 y SBU a 10 s no se encontró diferencia, a los 20 s y 30 s SBU presentó mayor RADR. En los tres grupos hubo aumento significativo de la RADR entre los 10 y 30 segundos.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología2019-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/1622110.15381/os.v22i2.16221Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019); 92-100Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2019); 92-1001609-86171560-9111reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221/14043Derechos de autor 2019 Ketty Amelia Arquíñego Garay, Armando Del Castillo Ayquipa, Rómel Watanabe Velásquezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/162212019-06-03T10:14:46Z
score 13.890581
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).