Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro
Descripción del Articulo
Objective. To evaluate the dentin-resin bond´s resistance (DRBR) of the adhesives Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) and Single Bond Universal (SBU) with its self-engraving possibility, in three different times of application. Methods. Experimental, comparative and crossectional in vitro...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2019 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/16221 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM) Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME) |
| id |
REVUNMSM_9d3c5fc664668ee1562e56377e92c02c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/16221 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro Resistencia adhesiva dentinaresina utilizando tres sistemas adhesivos a diferentes tiempos de aplicación. Estudio in vitro |
| title |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro |
| spellingShingle |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM) Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME) |
| title_short |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro |
| title_full |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro |
| title_fullStr |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro |
| title_sort |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitro |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel |
| author |
Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia |
| author_facet |
Arquíñego Garay, Ketty Amelia Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Del Castillo Ayquipa, Armando Watanabe Velásquez, Rómel |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM) Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME) |
| topic |
Dentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM) Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME) |
| description |
Objective. To evaluate the dentin-resin bond´s resistance (DRBR) of the adhesives Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) and Single Bond Universal (SBU) with its self-engraving possibility, in three different times of application. Methods. Experimental, comparative and crossectional in vitro study. We used nine human molars, obtaining 135 specimens of 1 mm2 approximately, forming nine study groups of 15 specimens for each group. The DRBR was measured through the Microtunsion test at a tensile force with an acceleration of 0.5mm/min until a fracture.The contrast of difference hypotheses was performed using the one-factor ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparisons, both at a confidence level of 95%. Results. After 10 seconds, significant differences were found between the OFL adhesive systems (25.78 ± 5.98 MPa) vs ASB2 (from 14.02 ± 3.06 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL vs SBU (14.36 ± 4.69 MPa) with p<0.001. At 20 seconds, between OFL (34.37 ± 6.03 MPa) and ASB2 (16.33 ± 3.02 MPa) at level p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (19.44 ± 5.98 MPa) with p<0.001. After 30 seconds, the same differences were found between OFL (37.6 ± 11.93 MPa) and ASB2 (16.62 ± 1.81 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (23.56) ± 7.3 MPa) with p<0.001. Conclusions. OFL presented greater DRBR compared to ASB2 and SBU in the three rubs; between ASB2 and SBU rubbing 10 s no difference was found, rubbing 20 s and 30 s SBU presented higher DRBR. In all three groups there was a significant increase in DRBR between 10 and 30 seconds. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-30 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221 10.15381/os.v22i2.16221 |
| url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/os.v22i2.16221 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221/14043 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019); 92-100 Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2019); 92-100 1609-8617 1560-9111 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| instacron_str |
UNMSM |
| institution |
UNMSM |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1795238211993206784 |
| spelling |
Resin dentin bond´s resistance using three adhesive systems at different application times. Study in vitroResistencia adhesiva dentinaresina utilizando tres sistemas adhesivos a diferentes tiempos de aplicación. Estudio in vitroArquíñego Garay, Ketty AmeliaDel Castillo Ayquipa, ArmandoWatanabe Velásquez, RómelDentin; Dental bonding; Adhesives (source: MeSH NLM)Dentina; Adhesión dental; Adhesivos (fuente: DeCS BIREME)Objective. To evaluate the dentin-resin bond´s resistance (DRBR) of the adhesives Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) and Single Bond Universal (SBU) with its self-engraving possibility, in three different times of application. Methods. Experimental, comparative and crossectional in vitro study. We used nine human molars, obtaining 135 specimens of 1 mm2 approximately, forming nine study groups of 15 specimens for each group. The DRBR was measured through the Microtunsion test at a tensile force with an acceleration of 0.5mm/min until a fracture.The contrast of difference hypotheses was performed using the one-factor ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparisons, both at a confidence level of 95%. Results. After 10 seconds, significant differences were found between the OFL adhesive systems (25.78 ± 5.98 MPa) vs ASB2 (from 14.02 ± 3.06 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL vs SBU (14.36 ± 4.69 MPa) with p<0.001. At 20 seconds, between OFL (34.37 ± 6.03 MPa) and ASB2 (16.33 ± 3.02 MPa) at level p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (19.44 ± 5.98 MPa) with p<0.001. After 30 seconds, the same differences were found between OFL (37.6 ± 11.93 MPa) and ASB2 (16.62 ± 1.81 MPa) at p<0.001, as well as between OFL and SBU (23.56) ± 7.3 MPa) with p<0.001. Conclusions. OFL presented greater DRBR compared to ASB2 and SBU in the three rubs; between ASB2 and SBU rubbing 10 s no difference was found, rubbing 20 s and 30 s SBU presented higher DRBR. In all three groups there was a significant increase in DRBR between 10 and 30 seconds.Objetivo. Evaluar la resistencia adhesiva dentina-resina (RADR) en adhesivos Optibond FL (OFL), Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2) y Single Bond Universal (SBU) en tres tiempos diferentes de aplicación. Métodos. Estudio experimental in vitro, se empleó nueve molares humanas obteniéndose, 135 especímenes de 1 mm2 aproximadamente conformando nueve grupos de estudio de 15 especímenes para cada grupo. La RADR se midió a través del test de microtensión a una fuerza de tracción con una aceleración de 0,5 mm/min hasta la fractura. El contraste de hipótesis de diferencia se realizó utilizando el test de ANOVA de un factor y comparaciones múltiples de Tukey, ambos a un nivel de confianza del 95%. Resultados. A los 10 segundos, se hallaron diferencias significativas entre los sistemas adhesivos OFL (25,78 ± 5,98 MPa) vs ASB2 (de 14,02 ± 3,06 MPa), p<0,001, así como entre OFL vs SBU (14,36 ± 4,69 MPa) con p<0,001. A los 20 segundos, entre OFL (34,37 ± 6,03 MPa) y ASB2 (16,33 ± 3,02 MPa), p<0,001, así como entre OFL y SBU (19,44 ± 5,98 MPa) con p<0,001. A los 30 segundos también se encontraron las mismas diferencias entre OFL (37,6 ± 11,93 MPa) y ASB2 (16,62 ± 1,81 MPa), p<0,001, así como entre OFL y SBU (23,56 ± 7,3 MPa) p<0,001. Conclusiones. Optibond FL presentó mayor RADR frente a ASB2 y SBU en los tres tiempos; entre ASB2 y SBU a 10 s no se encontró diferencia, a los 20 s y 30 s SBU presentó mayor RADR. En los tres grupos hubo aumento significativo de la RADR entre los 10 y 30 segundos.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Odontología2019-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/1622110.15381/os.v22i2.16221Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019); 92-100Odontología Sanmarquina; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2019); 92-1001609-86171560-9111reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16221/14043Derechos de autor 2019 Ketty Amelia Arquíñego Garay, Armando Del Castillo Ayquipa, Rómel Watanabe Velásquezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/162212019-06-03T10:14:46Z |
| score |
13.890581 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).