Challenges of requirements engineering in the (XP) methodology: a systematic review
Descripción del Articulo
The practice of Requirements Engineering (RI) in agile development is substantially different from traditional development. Extreme programming – (XP)(Beck, 2004) is one of the approaches of these agile methods. Traditional methodologies with their waterfall proposal, in pre-established phases, are...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/26312 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/matema/article/view/26312 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Ingeniería de requerimientos metodologías ágiles Practicas en ingeniería de requerimientos agiles programación extrema Requirement’s engineering agile methodologies Practices in agile requirements engineering extreme programming |
Sumario: | The practice of Requirements Engineering (RI) in agile development is substantially different from traditional development. Extreme programming – (XP)(Beck, 2004) is one of the approaches of these agile methods. Traditional methodologies with their waterfall proposal, in pre-established phases, are being replaced by agile methodologies, their interactive and incremental development, with nonstatic requirements. The objective of the study describes an inductive and empirical investigation on challenges and practices with the XP and IR methodology based on an analysis of data collected in academic and scientific literature. To achieve the results, a strategy was implemented that allowed document findings, following the guidelines of a Systematic Literature Review (RSL). In this way, we contribute with a description of challenges in IR in relation to the development of projects with the agile XP methodology. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).