Learning evaluation in the capabilities approach in higher education: a systematic review
Descripción del Articulo
The article presents the results of a systematic review on the assessment of learning from the capability approach in higher education. The identified problem lies in the fact that, although higher education curricula—including teacher education—declare the adoption of this approach, the assessment...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Marcelino Champagnat |
| Repositorio: | Revista educa UMCH |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.umch.edu.pe:article/363 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/363 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | enfoque de capacidades evaluación del aprendizaje educación superior evaluación formativa desarrollo humano capability approach learning assessment higher education formative assessment human development |
| Sumario: | The article presents the results of a systematic review on the assessment of learning from the capability approach in higher education. The identified problem lies in the fact that, although higher education curricula—including teacher education—declare the adoption of this approach, the assessment practices applied to students are not always consistent with its principles. In this context, the objective of the study was to identify the characteristics of the capability approach that are considered in learning assessment within higher education institutions. The review was conducted through a systematic search of academic databases and the Information System on Educational Trends in Latin America (SITEAL), which made it possible to identify relevant gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the theoretical and practical articulation between learning assessment and the capability approach. Nevertheless, convergences were found around emerging assessment practices, such as formative assessment, aimed at valuing student autonomy, diversity, and critical thinking. These practices reflect, albeit implicitly, fundamental principles of the capability approach, such as freedom, dignity, and respect for individual contexts.The methodological process followed the PRISMA statement and was supported by Rayyan, ResearchRabbit, and Atlas.ti for the selection, organization, and qualitative analysis of the included studies. It is concluded that there is a need to move toward assessment models consistent with higher education centered on human development, equity, and social justice. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).