Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To evaluate the healing effect of commercial sugar compared to 2% fusidic acid in wounds induced in rabbit skin. Materials and Methods: Qualitative experimental, observational, in vivo analytical study in rabbits with skin lesions. Wound were treated with blond sugar (10 and 20 g) directl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sudario Arainga, Judith Soledad, Acaro Chuquicaña, Fidel Ernesto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad María Auxiliadora
Repositorio:Agora
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/104
Enlace del recurso:https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/104
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Azúcar
Cicatrización
Heridas
Sugar
healing
Wounds
id REVUMA_74279cfae5323e59029ea6b1c291c031
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/104
network_acronym_str REVUMA
network_name_str Agora
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skinEvaluación del efecto cicatrizante del azúcar comercial en comparación con el ácido fusídico en piel de conejosSudario Arainga, Judith SoledadAcaro Chuquicaña, Fidel ErnestoAzúcarCicatrizaciónHeridasSugarhealingWoundsObjective: To evaluate the healing effect of commercial sugar compared to 2% fusidic acid in wounds induced in rabbit skin. Materials and Methods: Qualitative experimental, observational, in vivo analytical study in rabbits with skin lesions. Wound were treated with blond sugar (10 and 20 g) directly applied and also with 2% fusidic acid. By comparative study, the effectiveness of the treatment in the lesions was evaluated. Results: Sucrose was effective to cure wounds and stimulate healing in rabbits, obtaining similar results to fusidic acid at 2%, granulation tissue was observed early, which allowed to observe the healing phases with 10 days of treatment. Conclusions: it was demonstrated the pharmacological healing effect of sucrose similar to 2% fusidic acid directly (20 g).Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto cicatrizante del azúcar comercial comparado con el ácido fusídico al 2% en heridas inducidas en piel de conejo. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio cualitativo experimental, observacional in vivo analítico en conejos con lesiones de piel. Se trató las heridas con azúcar rubia (10 y 20 g) de forma directa y también con ácido fusídico al 2%. Mediante estudio comparativo, se evaluó la efectividad del tratamiento en las lesiones. Resultados: La sacarosa resultó efectiva para curar de las heridas y estimular la cicatrización en conejos, obteniendo resultados similares al ácido fusídico al 2%, el tejido de granulación se observó precozmente, lo que permitió observar las fases de cicatrización con 10 días de tratamiento. Conclusiones: Se demostró el efecto farmacológico cicatrizante de la sacarosa similar al ácido fusídico al 2% de forma directa (20 g).Universidad María Auxiliadora - UMA2019-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/10410.21679/arc.v6i2.132Revista Científica Ágora ; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2019); e52412-804X10.21679/arc.v6i2reponame:Agorainstname:Universidad María Auxiliadorainstacron:UMAspahttps://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/104/91Derechos de autor 2021 Judith Soledad Sudario Arainga, Fidel Ernesto Acaro Chuquicañahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.revistaagora.com:article/1042021-04-02T01:54:08Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
Evaluación del efecto cicatrizante del azúcar comercial en comparación con el ácido fusídico en piel de conejos
title Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
spellingShingle Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
Sudario Arainga, Judith Soledad
Azúcar
Cicatrización
Heridas
Sugar
healing
Wounds
title_short Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
title_full Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
title_fullStr Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
title_sort Evaluation of healing effect of commercial sugar compared to fusidic acid in rabbit skin
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sudario Arainga, Judith Soledad
Acaro Chuquicaña, Fidel Ernesto
author Sudario Arainga, Judith Soledad
author_facet Sudario Arainga, Judith Soledad
Acaro Chuquicaña, Fidel Ernesto
author_role author
author2 Acaro Chuquicaña, Fidel Ernesto
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Azúcar
Cicatrización
Heridas
Sugar
healing
Wounds
topic Azúcar
Cicatrización
Heridas
Sugar
healing
Wounds
description Objective: To evaluate the healing effect of commercial sugar compared to 2% fusidic acid in wounds induced in rabbit skin. Materials and Methods: Qualitative experimental, observational, in vivo analytical study in rabbits with skin lesions. Wound were treated with blond sugar (10 and 20 g) directly applied and also with 2% fusidic acid. By comparative study, the effectiveness of the treatment in the lesions was evaluated. Results: Sucrose was effective to cure wounds and stimulate healing in rabbits, obtaining similar results to fusidic acid at 2%, granulation tissue was observed early, which allowed to observe the healing phases with 10 days of treatment. Conclusions: it was demonstrated the pharmacological healing effect of sucrose similar to 2% fusidic acid directly (20 g).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/104
10.21679/arc.v6i2.132
url https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/104
identifier_str_mv 10.21679/arc.v6i2.132
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/104/91
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Judith Soledad Sudario Arainga, Fidel Ernesto Acaro Chuquicaña
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Judith Soledad Sudario Arainga, Fidel Ernesto Acaro Chuquicaña
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad María Auxiliadora - UMA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad María Auxiliadora - UMA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica Ágora ; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2019); e5
2412-804X
10.21679/arc.v6i2
reponame:Agora
instname:Universidad María Auxiliadora
instacron:UMA
instname_str Universidad María Auxiliadora
instacron_str UMA
institution UMA
reponame_str Agora
collection Agora
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1778116673609400320
score 13.92416
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).