VALORACIÓN DEL RIESGO FAMILIAR EN FAMILIAS CON NIÑOS CON ANEMIA EN UNA POBLACIÓN MARGINAL EN LIMA NORTE
Descripción del Articulo
Objectives: To determine the assessment of family risk in families with children with anemia in a marginal population in North Lima. Materials and methods: The focus of this study was quantitative, descriptive-crosssectional design. The population was made up of 197 heads of families who had as a me...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Universidad María Auxiliadora |
Repositorio: | Agora |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaagora.com:article/129 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistaagora.com/index.php/cieUMA/article/view/129 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Familia Salud de la familia Niño Anemia Family Family health Boy |
Sumario: | Objectives: To determine the assessment of family risk in families with children with anemia in a marginal population in North Lima. Materials and methods: The focus of this study was quantitative, descriptive-crosssectional design. The population was made up of 197 heads of families who had as a member at least one child under five years of age with anemia. The technique used was the survey and the measurement instrument was the RFT 5:33 Questionnaire. Results: As for the participants, the minimum age was 18 years and the maximum 48 years, the mean age being 23.66 years. Regarding the degree of anemia in children under 5 years of age, the mild level predominated with 56.9% (n = 112), followed by the moderate level with 39.6% (n = 78). According to the total family risk, families with low risk prevailed 56.9% (n = 112), followed by families threatened with 39.6% (n = 78) and families with high risk with 3.6% (n = 7). Regarding the dimensions, in health services and practices, families threatened predominated with 89.3% (n = 176); followed by the dimensions of housing and neighborhood conditions, socioeconomic situation and handling of minors, where threatened families prevailed with 87.8% (n = 173) in the three cases. Finally, in psycho-affective conditions, threatened families predominated with 84.3% (n = 166). Conclusions: Regarding family risk, low family risk predominated. In terms of dimensions, threatened families predominated in all of them. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).