The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the vaginal ring and vaginal progesteronecapsules in supporting the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization procedures. Methods:Retrospective study that evaluated pregnancy outcomes in female recipients ofembryos obtained from donation of both gametes by com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vargas-Tominaga, Luis, Medina, Andrea, Vargas, Andrea, Gómez, Maritza, Huillca, Flor, Vargas, Patricia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2447
Enlace del recurso:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Fase luteínica
soporte
Progesterona
Anillo vaginal
Fertilización in vitro
Luteal phase
support
Progesterone
Vaginal ring
Fertilization in vitro
id REVSPOG_b53ff57994196d94dbcaedbee9736ba8
oai_identifier_str oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2447
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
spelling The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilizationEl anillo vaginal de progesterona como soporte de la fase lútea en fertilización in vitroVargas-Tominaga, LuisMedina, AndreaVargas, AndreaGómez, MaritzaHuillca, FlorVargas, PatriciaFase luteínicasoporteProgesteronaAnillo vaginalFertilización in vitroLuteal phasesupportProgesteroneVaginal ringFertilization in vitroObjective: To compare the effectiveness of the vaginal ring and vaginal progesteronecapsules in supporting the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization procedures. Methods:Retrospective study that evaluated pregnancy outcomes in female recipients ofembryos obtained from donation of both gametes by comparing the effectivenessof the vaginal ring and vaginal progesterone capsules in supporting the luteal phasein in vitro fertilization procedures. Results: Thirty-eight women used the vaginal ringand 46 applied vaginal capsules as luteal phase support. Similar rates of implantation(36.5% versus 36.9%), clinical pregnancy (52.6% versus 50.0%) and live birth (50.0%versus 45.7%) were found. Conclusions: Similar implantation, clinical pregnancy andlive birth rates were found with the use of the vaginal ring and vaginal progesteronecapsules in the support of the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization procedures. Due tothe convenience of its use and adequate pregnancy rates, the progesterone vaginalring is an important alternative in the support of the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization.Objetivo. Comparar la efectividad del anillo vaginal y las cápsulas vaginales de progesterona en el soporte de la fase lútea en procedimientos de fertilización in vitro. Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo que evaluó los resultados de embarazo en mujeres receptoras de embriones logrados de donación de ambos gametos al comparar la efectividad del anillo vaginal y las cápsulas vaginales de progesterona en el soporte de la fase lútea en procedimientos de fertilización in vitro. Resultados. 38 mujeres usaron el anillo vaginal y 46 aplicaron las cápsulas vaginales como soporte de la fase lútea. Se halló tasas similares de implantación (36,5% versus 36,9%), embarazo clínico (52,6% versus 50,0%) y nacido vivo (50,0% versus 45,7%). Conclusiones. Se halló tasas similares de implantación, embarazo clínico y nacido vivo con el empleo del anillo vaginal y las cápsulas vaginales de progesterona en el soporte de la fase lútea en procedimientos de fertilización in vitro. Debido a la comodidad de su uso y a las adecuadas tasas de embarazo, el anillo vaginal de progesterona se constituye como una alternativa importante en el soporte de la fase lútea en la fertilización in vitro.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2022-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/244710.31403/rpgo.v68i2447The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2022)Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2022)2304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspaenghttps://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447/2672https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447/2673Derechos de autor 2022 Luis Vargas-Tominaga, Andrea Medina, Andrea Vargas, Maritza Gómez, Flor Huillca, Patricia Vargashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/24472026-01-12T15:21:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
El anillo vaginal de progesterona como soporte de la fase lútea en fertilización in vitro
title The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
spellingShingle The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
Vargas-Tominaga, Luis
Fase luteínica
soporte
Progesterona
Anillo vaginal
Fertilización in vitro
Luteal phase
support
Progesterone
Vaginal ring
Fertilization in vitro
title_short The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
title_full The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
title_fullStr The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
title_full_unstemmed The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
title_sort The progesterone vaginal ring as luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vargas-Tominaga, Luis
Medina, Andrea
Vargas, Andrea
Gómez, Maritza
Huillca, Flor
Vargas, Patricia
author Vargas-Tominaga, Luis
author_facet Vargas-Tominaga, Luis
Medina, Andrea
Vargas, Andrea
Gómez, Maritza
Huillca, Flor
Vargas, Patricia
author_role author
author2 Medina, Andrea
Vargas, Andrea
Gómez, Maritza
Huillca, Flor
Vargas, Patricia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fase luteínica
soporte
Progesterona
Anillo vaginal
Fertilización in vitro
Luteal phase
support
Progesterone
Vaginal ring
Fertilization in vitro
topic Fase luteínica
soporte
Progesterona
Anillo vaginal
Fertilización in vitro
Luteal phase
support
Progesterone
Vaginal ring
Fertilization in vitro
description Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the vaginal ring and vaginal progesteronecapsules in supporting the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization procedures. Methods:Retrospective study that evaluated pregnancy outcomes in female recipients ofembryos obtained from donation of both gametes by comparing the effectivenessof the vaginal ring and vaginal progesterone capsules in supporting the luteal phasein in vitro fertilization procedures. Results: Thirty-eight women used the vaginal ringand 46 applied vaginal capsules as luteal phase support. Similar rates of implantation(36.5% versus 36.9%), clinical pregnancy (52.6% versus 50.0%) and live birth (50.0%versus 45.7%) were found. Conclusions: Similar implantation, clinical pregnancy andlive birth rates were found with the use of the vaginal ring and vaginal progesteronecapsules in the support of the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization procedures. Due tothe convenience of its use and adequate pregnancy rates, the progesterone vaginalring is an important alternative in the support of the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447
10.31403/rpgo.v68i2447
url https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v68i2447
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447/2672
https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2447/2673
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2022)
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2022)
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1864273670803816448
score 13.473874
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).