Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases

Descripción del Articulo

Thousand consecutive cases of histologically proven cancer, seen at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases in the period of one year, have been studied and the responsibility for the patient and the physician in delayed diagnosis and treatment has been established. The main cause of delay in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cáceres, Eduardo, Mazzetti, Rafael, Romero, Justo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1134
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1134
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_9cfca5285d150655fd1761f82fd262a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1134
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
Demora en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer en el Perú. Estudio de 1,000 casos
title Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
spellingShingle Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
Cáceres, Eduardo
title_short Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
title_full Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
title_fullStr Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
title_full_unstemmed Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
title_sort Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 cases
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cáceres, Eduardo
Mazzetti, Rafael
Romero, Justo
author Cáceres, Eduardo
author_facet Cáceres, Eduardo
Mazzetti, Rafael
Romero, Justo
author_role author
author2 Mazzetti, Rafael
Romero, Justo
author2_role author
author
description Thousand consecutive cases of histologically proven cancer, seen at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases in the period of one year, have been studied and the responsibility for the patient and the physician in delayed diagnosis and treatment has been established. The main cause of delay in diagnosis has led to cause the patient's responsibility, 60.9 percent. Ignorance on the part of the patient has been the main cause in the delay, 94 .7 percent. The delay by the doctor, 25 .7 percent is attributed mainly to the fact that the cancer was not suspected and consequently appropriate studies are not checked for a diagnosis. Negligence, wrong inadequate examinations and recommendations were the main reasons for the delay. An individual who had symptoms for three or more months before consulting the doctor or consulted a doctor before this punishment in time and could not have a proper diagnosis or treatment, has wasted valuable time. In our series of 745 patients that is 74.5 percent suffered from this delay. The physician's responsibility to make an early diagnosis is limited to inaccessible cancers where the diagnosis requires special tests, but also accessible cancers, probably because the doctor did not suspect or does not interpret the signs and symptoms of early cancer not only. For this study it is obvious the urgent need for improved early diagnosis of cancer through patient education through adequate public propaganda and dissemination of knowledge of cancer among physicians. This work should be carried out by medical schools, medical societies and institutions interested in the problem of cancer.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1134
url http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1134
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1134/1090
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 3 No. 2 (1957); 54-64
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (1957); 54-64
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844614089396977664
spelling Delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer in Peru. Study of 1,000 casesDemora en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer en el Perú. Estudio de 1,000 casosCáceres, EduardoMazzetti, RafaelRomero, JustoThousand consecutive cases of histologically proven cancer, seen at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases in the period of one year, have been studied and the responsibility for the patient and the physician in delayed diagnosis and treatment has been established. The main cause of delay in diagnosis has led to cause the patient's responsibility, 60.9 percent. Ignorance on the part of the patient has been the main cause in the delay, 94 .7 percent. The delay by the doctor, 25 .7 percent is attributed mainly to the fact that the cancer was not suspected and consequently appropriate studies are not checked for a diagnosis. Negligence, wrong inadequate examinations and recommendations were the main reasons for the delay. An individual who had symptoms for three or more months before consulting the doctor or consulted a doctor before this punishment in time and could not have a proper diagnosis or treatment, has wasted valuable time. In our series of 745 patients that is 74.5 percent suffered from this delay. The physician's responsibility to make an early diagnosis is limited to inaccessible cancers where the diagnosis requires special tests, but also accessible cancers, probably because the doctor did not suspect or does not interpret the signs and symptoms of early cancer not only. For this study it is obvious the urgent need for improved early diagnosis of cancer through patient education through adequate public propaganda and dissemination of knowledge of cancer among physicians. This work should be carried out by medical schools, medical societies and institutions interested in the problem of cancer.Mil casos consecutivos de cáncer probados histológicamente, vistos en el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas en el período de un año, han sido estudiados y la responsabilidad por parte del paciente y del médico en la demora en el diagnóstico y tratamiento ha sido establecida. La principal causa de demora en el diagnóstico ha tenido como causa la responsabilidad del paciente, 60.9 por ciento. La ignorancia por parte del paciente ha sido la causa principal en su demora, 94 .7 por ciento. La demora por parte del médico, 25 .7 por ciento, es atribuida principalmente al hecho de que el carcinoma no fue sospechado y como consecuencia no se verificaron apropiados estudios para establecer un diagnóstico. Negligencia, exámenes inadecuados y recomendaciones equivocadas fueron las principales razones en la demora. Un individuo que tuvo síntomas por tres o más meses antes de su consulta al médico o consultó a un médico antes de este penado de tiempo y no pudo tener un diagnóstico o tratamiento adecuado, ha perdido un tiempo valioso. En nuestra serie 745 pacientes o sea 74.5 por ciento sufrieron de esta demora. La responsabilidad del médico para hacer un diagnóstico temprano, no sólo es limitado a los cánceres inaccesibles donde el diagnóstico no requiere exámenes especiales, sino también a los cánceres accesibles, probablemente porque el médico no sospecha o no interpreta los signos y síntomas del cáncer inicial. Por este estudio resulta obvio la imperiosa necesidad de una mejora en el diagnóstico temprano del cáncer, mediante la educación del paciente a través de una adecuada propaganda en el público y la difusión de los conocimientos del cáncer entre los médicos. Esta labor deberá ser llevada a cabo por las Escuelas de Medicina, las Sociedades Médicas y las Instituciones interesadas en el problema del cáncer.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1134The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 3 No. 2 (1957); 54-64Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (1957); 54-642304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1134/1090info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11342015-07-21T18:05:04Z
score 13.4165325
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).