The principle of non-criminalization of victims of trafficking and exploitation in the theory of crime
Descripción del Articulo
This article examines how the principle of noncriminalization of victims of human trafficking and exploitation, based on international human rights law, is transferred to criminal theory. It begins by analyzing the role of criminal dogmatics, particularly...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31016 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31016 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Human trafficking Non-criminalization Crime theory Norm theory Enforceability of other conduct Trata de personas No criminalización Teoría del delito Teoría de las normas Exigibilidad de otra conducta |
Sumario: | This article examines how the principle of noncriminalization of victims of human trafficking and exploitation, based on international human rights law, is transferred to criminal theory. It begins by analyzing the role of criminal dogmatics, particularly within academia, in the judicial application of criminal law.From this perspective, the construction of criminal norms is examined in its argumentative and communicative dimensions, emphasizing two key aspects: the norm’s recipient and its content. In this context, the traditional positioning of imputability and the requirement of alternative conduct within culpability is questioned, as well as the distinction between typicity and unlawfulness. Human trafficking and exploitation are characterized as phenomena involving relationships of dominance or control over victims, and the principle of non-criminalization is justified based on the need for their protection, as established in the Palermo Protocol.Finally, it is concluded that this principle entails the application of a case of individual non-exigibility, preventing the State from addressing trafficking victims as recipients of criminal norms, which has direct implications for criminal proceedings and the protection of their rights. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).