Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges
Descripción del Articulo
This round table discussion examines the return to bicameralism, a reform that has raised new doubts regarding its viability. Although Peru was governed under this system in the past, the main current criticism lies in the fact that this measure was approved despite its rejection by the population i...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33571 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Bicameralism Constitutional reform Senate Deputies Balance of Powers Constitutional law Legitimacy Bicameralidad Reforma constitucional Senado Diputados Equilibrio de poderes Derecho Constitucional Legitimidad |
| id |
REVPUCP_a777c7206f7e7dcbaaad96de8108b06d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33571 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challengesDebates sobre bicameralidad: perspectivas y retosRubio Correa, MarcialPomareda Muñoz, DiegoLovatón Palacios, DavidBicameralismConstitutional reformSenateDeputiesBalance of PowersConstitutional lawLegitimacyBicameralidadReforma constitucionalSenadoDiputadosEquilibrio de poderesDerecho ConstitucionalLegitimidadThis round table discussion examines the return to bicameralism, a reform that has raised new doubts regarding its viability. Although Peru was governed under this system in the past, the main current criticism lies in the fact that this measure was approved despite its rejection by the population in a referendum, which seriously compromises its legitimacy.The authors agree that this change is risky: it alters the balance of powers in favor of the Parliament, increases public spending, and does not ensure faster processes. Ultimately, this reform does not resolve the main problem: Parliament’s lack of representation, a debate from which the reader may draw their own conclusions.En esta mesa redonda se examina el regreso de la bicameralidad, una reforma que ha generado nuevas dudas sobre su viabilidad. Aunque, en el pasado, el Perú estuvo regido por este sistema, el mayor cuestionamiento actual reside en que esta medida se aprobó pese a su rechazo por la población en referéndum, lo que afecta seriamente su legitimidad.Los autores coinciden en que el cambio es riesgoso: altera el equilibrio de poderes a favor del Congreso, aumenta el gasto público y no asegura procesos más rápidos. En el fondo, esta reforma no resuelve el problema principal, que es la falta de representatividad del Parlamento, un debate sobre el cual el lector podrá sacar sus propias conclusiones.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2025-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 88 (2025): Derecho Constitucional; 369-3741810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28768http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28834http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28839http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/335712026-04-08T21:06:49Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges Debates sobre bicameralidad: perspectivas y retos |
| title |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges |
| spellingShingle |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges Rubio Correa, Marcial Bicameralism Constitutional reform Senate Deputies Balance of Powers Constitutional law Legitimacy Bicameralidad Reforma constitucional Senado Diputados Equilibrio de poderes Derecho Constitucional Legitimidad |
| title_short |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges |
| title_full |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges |
| title_fullStr |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges |
| title_sort |
Debates on bicameralism: perspectives and challenges |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rubio Correa, Marcial Pomareda Muñoz, Diego Lovatón Palacios, David |
| author |
Rubio Correa, Marcial |
| author_facet |
Rubio Correa, Marcial Pomareda Muñoz, Diego Lovatón Palacios, David |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pomareda Muñoz, Diego Lovatón Palacios, David |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Bicameralism Constitutional reform Senate Deputies Balance of Powers Constitutional law Legitimacy Bicameralidad Reforma constitucional Senado Diputados Equilibrio de poderes Derecho Constitucional Legitimidad |
| topic |
Bicameralism Constitutional reform Senate Deputies Balance of Powers Constitutional law Legitimacy Bicameralidad Reforma constitucional Senado Diputados Equilibrio de poderes Derecho Constitucional Legitimidad |
| description |
This round table discussion examines the return to bicameralism, a reform that has raised new doubts regarding its viability. Although Peru was governed under this system in the past, the main current criticism lies in the fact that this measure was approved despite its rejection by the population in a referendum, which seriously compromises its legitimacy.The authors agree that this change is risky: it alters the balance of powers in favor of the Parliament, increases public spending, and does not ensure faster processes. Ultimately, this reform does not resolve the main problem: Parliament’s lack of representation, a debate from which the reader may draw their own conclusions. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-19 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571 |
| url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28768 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28834 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28839 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 88 (2025): Derecho Constitucional; 369-374 1810-9934 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
| instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| instacron_str |
PUCP |
| institution |
PUCP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1864365809015455744 |
| score |
13.052659 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).