The Controversy on the Theory of Capital

• Autor: Jiménez, Félix
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2012
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3842
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/3842
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: neoclassical production function; measurement of capital; substitution production function; rate of return on capital; theory of capital; función de producción neoclásica; medición del capital; función de producción sustituta; tasa de retorno de capital; teoría del capital

This chapter contains the capital theory controversy that took place among the most importanteconomists from the universities of Cambridge (UK) and Cambridge (Mass.). Firstly, we presentthe neoclassical propositions which are summarized in the neoclassical parables. The second section contains Robinson’s criticism of the neoclassical capital theory and Garegnani’s criticismof the decreasing marginal productivity theory. Thirdly, we summarize Samuelson’s attempt to validate the neoclassical production function and his main mistakes. The fourth section presents Solow’s response and Nell’s criticism. Finally, in the fifth section, we present the main contributions to the capital theory controversy.