Hazards on sanctioning the Recommendations as an anti-competitive practice in the Peruvian Law

• Autor: Quintana Sánchez, Eduardo
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2015
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:revistaspuc:article/15651
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15651
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Recomendaciones; Colusión horizontal; Colusión vertical; Carteles; Conductas anticompetitivas; Derecho de la Competencia; Libre competencia; INDECOPI; recommendations; Horizontal collusion; Vertical collusion; Cartels - Anticompetitive practices; Antitrust; Free competition

On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a horizontal agreement (cartel). It also analyzes in which instances said application has been inaccurate and the issues surrounding it. Finally, the author illustrates the complexity of framing recommendations as vertical agreements in the absence of “collusion between two or more parties”