Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook

Descripción del Articulo

The theory of the sanction, its purposes and the general object of the criminal legal system, have always brought substantial questioning by the dogmatic penitentiary, that is why its legitimacy has been questioned, for the lack of better arguments. It is in this background that the teacher Eugene R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Alegría Hidalgo, Juan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2008
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/150
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/150
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:criminal law
theories of efficient penalty
derecho penal
teorías de la pena
id REVPJ_f98f67b41ec9306d53f2b530002ae5d4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/150
network_acronym_str REVPJ
network_name_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebookEsquema comparativo del pensamiento de Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni y Carlos Santiago Nino en relación a la teoría de la pena: Cuaderno de navegaciónAlegría Hidalgo, Juancriminal lawtheories of efficient penaltyderecho penalteorías de la penaThe theory of the sanction, its purposes and the general object of the criminal legal system, have always brought substantial questioning by the dogmatic penitentiary, that is why its legitimacy has been questioned, for the lack of better arguments. It is in this background that the teacher Eugene Raul Zaffaroni from Argentina, sets out certain positions by which he questions the entire Latin American criminal system. In this context, began the debate with criminal attorney and well known philosopher of law Carlos Santiago Nino. It seems to us very interesting to know the points of divergence as well as the conformities between both. That is the reason for the present work, which is presented as guide for further discutions and developments.El tema de la teoría de la pena, sus fines y la finalidad en general del sistema jurídico penal, siempre han traído cuestionamientos sustanciales por la dogmática penal, de tal forma que en estricto la legitimidad del mismo ha quedado en cuestionamiento a falta de mejores argumentos. Es en este contexto que el maestro argentino Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni expuso ciertas posiciones por las que cuestiona a todo el Sistema Penal Latinoamericano. Con este motivo se iniciaría un debate con el también penalista y muy conocido filósofo del derecho, Carlos Santiago Nino. Nos parece muy interesante conocer los puntos de divergencia así como las conformidades entre ambos. Esa es la razón del presente trabajo que se presenta como guía de ruta para mayores disquisiciones y desarrollos.Poder Judicial del Perú2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/15010.35292/ropj.v4i4.150Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2008): Julio - Diciembre; 93-1142663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v4i4reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/150/213info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1502021-07-16T04:51:38Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
Esquema comparativo del pensamiento de Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni y Carlos Santiago Nino en relación a la teoría de la pena: Cuaderno de navegación
title Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
spellingShingle Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
Alegría Hidalgo, Juan
criminal law
theories of efficient penalty
derecho penal
teorías de la pena
title_short Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
title_full Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
title_fullStr Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
title_full_unstemmed Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
title_sort Comparative scheme of the thought of Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni and Carlos Santiago Nino in relation to the theory of penalty: Navigation notebook
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alegría Hidalgo, Juan
author Alegría Hidalgo, Juan
author_facet Alegría Hidalgo, Juan
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv criminal law
theories of efficient penalty
derecho penal
teorías de la pena
topic criminal law
theories of efficient penalty
derecho penal
teorías de la pena
description The theory of the sanction, its purposes and the general object of the criminal legal system, have always brought substantial questioning by the dogmatic penitentiary, that is why its legitimacy has been questioned, for the lack of better arguments. It is in this background that the teacher Eugene Raul Zaffaroni from Argentina, sets out certain positions by which he questions the entire Latin American criminal system. In this context, began the debate with criminal attorney and well known philosopher of law Carlos Santiago Nino. It seems to us very interesting to know the points of divergence as well as the conformities between both. That is the reason for the present work, which is presented as guide for further discutions and developments.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/150
10.35292/ropj.v4i4.150
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/150
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v4i4.150
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/150/213
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2008): Julio - Diciembre; 93-114
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v4i4
reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
instname:Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron:PJ
instname_str Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron_str PJ
institution PJ
reponame_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
collection Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846797558905569280
score 12.624894
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).