Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ST- elevation myocardial infarction care in Peru

• Autores: Custodio - Sánchez, Piero, Miranda, David, Murillo, Luis
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular
• Repositorio: Archivos peruanos de cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:apcyccv.org.pe:article/22
• Enlace del recurso: https://apcyccv.org.pe/index.php/apccc/article/view/22
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Infarto de miocardio; COVID-19; SARS-CoV2; myocardial infarction

Abstract Purpose: To compare the number of admissions, clinical features and therapeutic outcomes of patients treated for acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), before and after the COVID-19 pandemic state of emergency in Peru. Methods: Comparative and descriptive study of cohorts, derivated from the PEruvian Registry of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction II (PERSTEMI II). We compared the patients treated for STEMI, between 45 days before and during the first 45 days of the COVID-19 state of emergency in Peru. Results: During the first 45 days of the COVID-19 state of emergency, the team found a 59% decrease on the number of admissions for STEMI. There was a larger proportion of patients with high blood pressure and dyslipidemia. We noticed a decreasing trend in the access to reperfusion therapies (73% vs. 66.6%); the fibrinolysis was the most commonly used therapy. The most frequent reason of not reperfusion was the late onset >24 hours (41.7%, p=0.004). There was a trend of time reduction to first medical contact and less ischemia time to reperfusion. A lower incidence of post-infarction heart failure was registered. The mortality was similar in both groups (3.4% vs. 2.7%). Conclusions: COVID-19 pandemic in Peru has generated a significant reduction of STEMI admissions and a trend in less use of reperfusion therapies. The late onset of patients was the most common reason of not reperfusion. Key words: