Cervical cancer and self-responsibility: Modeling the risk of refraining to undergo a papanicolaou test among Chilean women by decision trees
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To model by statistical means the risk levels of refraining to undergo a papanicolaou test among Chilean women according to sociodemographic variables. Materials and methods: National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey (CASEN). Sample of 73,324 cases, according to CASEN’s data. Modelin...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
Repositorio: | Horizonte médico |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe:article/702 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://www.horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontemed/article/view/702 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Uterine cervical neoplasms Papanicolaou test Women's health Self care Cáncer de cuello uterino Prueba de Papanicolaou Salud de la mujer Autocuidado |
Sumario: | Objective: To model by statistical means the risk levels of refraining to undergo a papanicolaou test among Chilean women according to sociodemographic variables. Materials and methods: National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey (CASEN). Sample of 73,324 cases, according to CASEN’s data. Modeling by decision trees to establish the profile of women who refrain from undergoing a papanicolaou test, and then analyze the reasons for that decision. Results: The risk of refraining to undergo a papanicolaou test varies considerably and depends on variables such as other cancer preventive tests (not undergoing a mammography), adulthood stage (late phase), and marital status. The traditional lack of information and access is replaced by personal reasons as the frequent excuse for not undergoing a papanicolaou test on a continuous basis. Perception of unusefulness and lack of time cause this refraining behavior as a decision and not as an impossibility. Conclusions: The results question contemporary women’s characteristics and behaviors, and pose the need for considering a social-educational intervention as a requirement to generate favorable attitudes towards prevention. These factors should be considered by social policy on cancer prevention in general, and particularly in cervical cancer prevention. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).