Standards of Proof and Constitutional Protection of the Family: The Probative Accreditation Matrix Model for Family Relationships (MAP-RFH)
Descripción del Articulo
The present article aims to propose an evidentiary test (composed of six modules) to establish non-marital family relationships, based on an epistemological methodology focused on facts (Gascón Abellán, Taruffo, and Ferrer Beltrán) translated into factual indicators (such as cohabitation, care, comm...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1343 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/1343 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | proof of facts functional family concubinage standards of sufficiency fundamental rights prueba de los hechos familia funcional concubinato estándares de suficiencia derechos fundamentales prova dos fatos família funcional padrões de suficiência direitos fundamentais |
| Sumario: | The present article aims to propose an evidentiary test (composed of six modules) to establish non-marital family relationships, based on an epistemological methodology focused on facts (Gascón Abellán, Taruffo, and Ferrer Beltrán) translated into factual indicators (such as cohabitation, care, community of life and risks, patrimonial ties, publicity, and social recognition), as well as on socio-legal evidence (2010–2025). The results include a comparative analysis grounded in international law (the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights [IACtHR] and the European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR]) and in the national courts of countries around the world (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Spain, South Africa, India, and Canada). The conclusions establish standards of sufficiency for the proposed model (plausibility and a convincing explanation), as well as refutability and bias control, which are intended to serve as guidance for the reasoning of judicial decisions with a human-rights-based approach. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).