Standards of Proof and Constitutional Protection of the Family: The Probative Accreditation Matrix Model for Family Relationships (MAP-RFH)

Descripción del Articulo

The present article aims to propose an evidentiary test (composed of six modules) to establish non-marital family relationships, based on an epistemological methodology focused on facts (Gascón Abellán, Taruffo, and Ferrer Beltrán) translated into factual indicators (such as cohabitation, care, comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: López Sánchez, Rogelio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Repositorio:Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1343
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/1343
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:proof of facts
functional family
concubinage
standards of sufficiency
fundamental rights
prueba de los hechos
familia funcional
concubinato
estándares de suficiencia
derechos fundamentales
prova dos fatos
família funcional
padrões de suficiência
direitos fundamentais
Descripción
Sumario:The present article aims to propose an evidentiary test (composed of six modules) to establish non-marital family relationships, based on an epistemological methodology focused on facts (Gascón Abellán, Taruffo, and Ferrer Beltrán) translated into factual indicators (such as cohabitation, care, community of life and risks, patrimonial ties, publicity, and social recognition), as well as on socio-legal evidence (2010–2025). The results include a comparative analysis grounded in international law (the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights [IACtHR] and the European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR]) and in the national courts of countries around the world (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Spain, South Africa, India, and Canada). The conclusions establish standards of sufficiency for the proposed model (plausibility and a convincing explanation), as well as refutability and bias control, which are intended to serve as guidance for the reasoning of judicial decisions with a human-rights-based approach.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).