Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To Determine the validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Peruvian adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis in a national rehabilitation institute. Materials and methods: Seventy-three adolescents affected by idiopathic scoliosis between 10 and 17...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Amaya-Solís, Karen Patricia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Colegio Médico del Perú
Repositorio:Acta Médica Peruana
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:amp.cmp.org.pe:article/3401
Enlace del recurso:https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Estudio de Validación
Escoliosis
Adolescente
Validation Study
Scoliosis
Adolescent
id REVCMP_4f66abc415a5067e8f221815160f02d4
oai_identifier_str oai:amp.cmp.org.pe:article/3401
network_acronym_str REVCMP
network_name_str Acta Médica Peruana
repository_id_str .
spelling Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation instituteValidez y confiabilidad del cuestionario Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) en adolescentes con escoliosis idiopática de un instituto peruano de rehabilitaciónAmaya-Solís, Karen PatriciaAmaya-Solís, Karen PatriciaEstudio de ValidaciónEscoliosisAdolescenteValidation StudyScoliosisAdolescentObjective: To Determine the validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Peruvian adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis in a national rehabilitation institute. Materials and methods: Seventy-three adolescents affected by idiopathic scoliosis between 10 and 17 years of age [13.6±1.8), collected through non-probability sampling, were evaluated. Validity based on internal structure was reported through confirmatory factor analysis; reliability by means of Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficient; and validity based on the relationship with other variables was tested between the SRS-22 with the Short Form Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and QoL Profile for Spine Deformities (QLPSD). Results: The original model [SRS-22) was found to have adequate evidence of factorial validity with better fit indices (X2 /gL=1.36, CFI=0.962, TLI=0.956, RMSEA=0.07 [0.047-0.091], SRMR=0.122) compared to the short models [SRS-16 and SRS-7). The reliability of the original model was satisfactory for each of the factors, with values above 0.70. Regarding validity based on the relationship with other variables, direct significant relationships were identified between the SRS-22 and SF-36 and QLPSD. Conclusions: The SRS-22 has adequate evidence of validity and reliability for the sample evaluated, requiring further revision of the short versions.Objetivo: determinar la validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) en adolescentes peruanos con escoliosis idiopática en un instituto nacional de rehabilitación. Materiales y métodos: se evaluaron a 73 adolescentes con el diagnóstico de escoliosis idiopática entre las edades de 10 a 17 años [13,6±1,8), recolectados a través de un muestreo no probabilístico. Se reportó la validez basada en la estructura interna a través de un análisis factorial confirmatorio; la confiabilidad por medio del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach y omega de McDonald; y se probó la validez basada en la relación con otras variables entre el SRS-22 y el cuestionario Short Form Survey (SF-36) y el cuestionario calidad de vida en adolescentes con deformidades raquídeas[CAVIDRA). Resultados: se encontró que el modelo original(SRS-22)tuvo una adecuada evidencia de validez factorial con mejores índices de ajuste (X2 /gL=1,36, CFI=0,962, TLI=0,956, RMSEA= 0,07 [0,047-0,091], SRMR = 0,122) que los modelos breves (SRS-16 y SRS-7). La confiabilidad del modelo original fue satisfactoria para cada uno de los factores, con valores superiores al 0,70. En cuanto a la validez basada en la relación con otras variables, se identificaron relaciones significativas directas entre el SRS-22 con el SF-36 y el CAVIDRA. Conclusiones: el SRS-22 cuenta con una adecuada evidencia de validez y confiabilidad para la muestra evaluada, requiriendo una mayor revisión de las versiones breves.Colegio Médico del Perú2025-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/340110.35663/amp.2025.422.3401ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025): April - June; 111-120ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 42 Núm. 2 (2025): Abril - Junio; 111-1201728-59171018-8800reponame:Acta Médica Peruanainstname:Colegio Médico del Perúinstacron:CMPspahttps://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401/1963https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401/1990Copyright (c) 2025 ACTA MEDICA PERUANAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:amp.cmp.org.pe:article/34012025-10-26T00:05:36Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
Validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) en adolescentes con escoliosis idiopática de un instituto peruano de rehabilitación
title Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
spellingShingle Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
Amaya-Solís, Karen Patricia
Estudio de Validación
Escoliosis
Adolescente
Validation Study
Scoliosis
Adolescent
title_short Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
title_full Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
title_sort Validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a national rehabilitation institute
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Amaya-Solís, Karen Patricia
Amaya-Solís, Karen Patricia
author Amaya-Solís, Karen Patricia
author_facet Amaya-Solís, Karen Patricia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Estudio de Validación
Escoliosis
Adolescente
Validation Study
Scoliosis
Adolescent
topic Estudio de Validación
Escoliosis
Adolescente
Validation Study
Scoliosis
Adolescent
description Objective: To Determine the validity and reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Peruvian adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis in a national rehabilitation institute. Materials and methods: Seventy-three adolescents affected by idiopathic scoliosis between 10 and 17 years of age [13.6±1.8), collected through non-probability sampling, were evaluated. Validity based on internal structure was reported through confirmatory factor analysis; reliability by means of Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficient; and validity based on the relationship with other variables was tested between the SRS-22 with the Short Form Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and QoL Profile for Spine Deformities (QLPSD). Results: The original model [SRS-22) was found to have adequate evidence of factorial validity with better fit indices (X2 /gL=1.36, CFI=0.962, TLI=0.956, RMSEA=0.07 [0.047-0.091], SRMR=0.122) compared to the short models [SRS-16 and SRS-7). The reliability of the original model was satisfactory for each of the factors, with values above 0.70. Regarding validity based on the relationship with other variables, direct significant relationships were identified between the SRS-22 and SF-36 and QLPSD. Conclusions: The SRS-22 has adequate evidence of validity and reliability for the sample evaluated, requiring further revision of the short versions.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401
10.35663/amp.2025.422.3401
url https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401
identifier_str_mv 10.35663/amp.2025.422.3401
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401/1963
https://amp.cmp.org.pe/index.php/AMP/article/view/3401/1990
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2025 ACTA MEDICA PERUANA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2025 ACTA MEDICA PERUANA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colegio Médico del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colegio Médico del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025): April - June; 111-120
ACTA MEDICA PERUANA; Vol. 42 Núm. 2 (2025): Abril - Junio; 111-120
1728-5917
1018-8800
reponame:Acta Médica Peruana
instname:Colegio Médico del Perú
instacron:CMP
instname_str Colegio Médico del Perú
instacron_str CMP
institution CMP
reponame_str Acta Médica Peruana
collection Acta Médica Peruana
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1847149925471617024
score 13.434648
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).