Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger

Descripción del Articulo

This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Saldaña E., Serrano-León J., Selani M.M., Contreras-Castillo C.J.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2581
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Pink pepper
Active packaging
CATA questions
Meat product
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
id CONC_227853730b2d86ccb8f96b6dc3d69b1a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2581
network_acronym_str CONC
network_name_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository_id_str 4689
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
title Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
spellingShingle Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
Saldaña E.
Pink pepper
Active packaging
CATA questions
Meat product
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
title_short Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
title_full Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
title_fullStr Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
title_full_unstemmed Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
title_sort Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
author Saldaña E.
author_facet Saldaña E.
Serrano-León J.
Selani M.M.
Contreras-Castillo C.J.
author_role author
author2 Serrano-León J.
Selani M.M.
Contreras-Castillo C.J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saldaña E.
Serrano-León J.
Selani M.M.
Contreras-Castillo C.J.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pink pepper
topic Pink pepper
Active packaging
CATA questions
Meat product
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Active packaging
CATA questions
Meat product
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02
description This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to the film, respectively; C1 and C2: commercial brands of chicken burgers. Consumers characterized the samples using the overall liking test and Check-all-that-apply questions. The samples showed a medium–high level of acceptance and no significant differences were found between them. DP was the farthest sample from the ideal and FP showed positive results, since its characteristics were like the commercial samples. The direct extract application may lead to a reduction in the liking of chicken burgers, demonstrating that the technology of active films is a viable alternative to the use of natural antioxidant extracts in meat products. © 2019, Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85074000087
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x
identifier_str_mv 2-s2.0-85074000087
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Food Science and Technology
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional
instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron:CONCYTEC
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron_str CONCYTEC
institution CONCYTEC
reponame_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
collection CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@concytec.gob.pe
_version_ 1839175747746398208
spelling Publicationrp00628600rp06637600rp00978600rp00627600Saldaña E.Serrano-León J.Selani M.M.Contreras-Castillo C.J.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2020https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x2-s2.0-85074000087This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to the film, respectively; C1 and C2: commercial brands of chicken burgers. Consumers characterized the samples using the overall liking test and Check-all-that-apply questions. The samples showed a medium–high level of acceptance and no significant differences were found between them. DP was the farthest sample from the ideal and FP showed positive results, since its characteristics were like the commercial samples. The direct extract application may lead to a reduction in the liking of chicken burgers, demonstrating that the technology of active films is a viable alternative to the use of natural antioxidant extracts in meat products. © 2019, Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India).Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico - FondecytengSpringerJournal of Food Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPink pepperActive packaging-1CATA questions-1Meat product-1http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02-1Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burgerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#20.500.12390/2581oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/25812024-05-30 15:25:02.995http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c9896b15-d604-4df2-9311-086692659c5d"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Journal of Food Science and Technology</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2020</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85074000087</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Saldaña E.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00628" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Serrano-León J.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06637" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Selani M.M.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00978" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Contreras-Castillo C.J.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00627" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Springer</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>Pink pepper</Keyword> <Keyword>Active packaging</Keyword> <Keyword>CATA questions</Keyword> <Keyword>Meat product</Keyword> <Abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to the film, respectively; C1 and C2: commercial brands of chicken burgers. Consumers characterized the samples using the overall liking test and Check-all-that-apply questions. The samples showed a medium–high level of acceptance and no significant differences were found between them. DP was the farthest sample from the ideal and FP showed positive results, since its characteristics were like the commercial samples. The direct extract application may lead to a reduction in the liking of chicken burgers, demonstrating that the technology of active films is a viable alternative to the use of natural antioxidant extracts in meat products. © 2019, Association of Food Scientists &amp; Technologists (India).</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1
score 13.448654
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).