Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger
Descripción del Articulo
This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to th...
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2581 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Pink pepper Active packaging CATA questions Meat product http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02 |
id |
CONC_227853730b2d86ccb8f96b6dc3d69b1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2581 |
network_acronym_str |
CONC |
network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
4689 |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
title |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
spellingShingle |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger Saldaña E. Pink pepper Active packaging CATA questions Meat product http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02 |
title_short |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
title_full |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
title_fullStr |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
title_sort |
Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger |
author |
Saldaña E. |
author_facet |
Saldaña E. Serrano-León J. Selani M.M. Contreras-Castillo C.J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Serrano-León J. Selani M.M. Contreras-Castillo C.J. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saldaña E. Serrano-León J. Selani M.M. Contreras-Castillo C.J. |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Pink pepper |
topic |
Pink pepper Active packaging CATA questions Meat product http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02 |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Active packaging CATA questions Meat product |
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02 |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to the film, respectively; C1 and C2: commercial brands of chicken burgers. Consumers characterized the samples using the overall liking test and Check-all-that-apply questions. The samples showed a medium–high level of acceptance and no significant differences were found between them. DP was the farthest sample from the ideal and FP showed positive results, since its characteristics were like the commercial samples. The direct extract application may lead to a reduction in the liking of chicken burgers, demonstrating that the technology of active films is a viable alternative to the use of natural antioxidant extracts in meat products. © 2019, Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x |
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85074000087 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x |
identifier_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85074000087 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Food Science and Technology |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
institution |
CONCYTEC |
reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
_version_ |
1839175747746398208 |
spelling |
Publicationrp00628600rp06637600rp00978600rp00627600Saldaña E.Serrano-León J.Selani M.M.Contreras-Castillo C.J.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2020https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2581https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x2-s2.0-85074000087This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to the film, respectively; C1 and C2: commercial brands of chicken burgers. Consumers characterized the samples using the overall liking test and Check-all-that-apply questions. The samples showed a medium–high level of acceptance and no significant differences were found between them. DP was the farthest sample from the ideal and FP showed positive results, since its characteristics were like the commercial samples. The direct extract application may lead to a reduction in the liking of chicken burgers, demonstrating that the technology of active films is a viable alternative to the use of natural antioxidant extracts in meat products. © 2019, Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India).Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico - FondecytengSpringerJournal of Food Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPink pepperActive packaging-1CATA questions-1Meat product-1http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.11.02-1Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burgerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#20.500.12390/2581oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/25812024-05-30 15:25:02.995http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c9896b15-d604-4df2-9311-086692659c5d"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Journal of Food Science and Technology</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2020</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04093-x</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85074000087</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Saldaña E.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00628" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Serrano-León J.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06637" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Selani M.M.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00978" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Contreras-Castillo C.J.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00627" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Springer</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>Pink pepper</Keyword> <Keyword>Active packaging</Keyword> <Keyword>CATA questions</Keyword> <Keyword>Meat product</Keyword> <Abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the sensory and hedonic perceptions of chicken burger manufactured with pink pepper residue extract (PPE) added to the meat and to the chitosan film. Five samples were manufactured: CT: control, without antioxidant; DP and FP: addition of PPE to the meat batter and to the film, respectively; C1 and C2: commercial brands of chicken burgers. Consumers characterized the samples using the overall liking test and Check-all-that-apply questions. The samples showed a medium–high level of acceptance and no significant differences were found between them. DP was the farthest sample from the ideal and FP showed positive results, since its characteristics were like the commercial samples. The direct extract application may lead to a reduction in the liking of chicken burgers, demonstrating that the technology of active films is a viable alternative to the use of natural antioxidant extracts in meat products. © 2019, Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India).</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
score |
13.448654 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).