COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of this study was to compare the Direct method and the Friedewald formula method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in dogs. Blood samples were collected in 185 fasted dogs without sex restriction. Serum was extracted and levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the two methods. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Osorio, José Henry, Suárez, Yirly Johanna, Vinasco, Jazmín
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2014
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/10801
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10801
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:LDL cholesterol
canine
direct method
friedewald method
colesterol LDL
perro
método directo
fórmula de Friedewald
id 1609-9117_4271f8e205e35e603018020186fa7362
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/10801
network_acronym_str 1609-9117
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
spelling COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGSComparación entre el Método Directo y la Fórmula de Friedewald para Determinar los Niveles de Colesterol LDL en CaninosOsorio, José HenrySuárez, Yirly JohannaVinasco, JazmínLDL cholesterolcaninedirect methodfriedewald methodcolesterol LDLperrométodo directofórmula de FriedewaldThe aim of this study was to compare the Direct method and the Friedewald formula method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in dogs. Blood samples were collected in 185 fasted dogs without sex restriction. Serum was extracted and levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the two methods. The mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values by the Direct method were 49.2 ± 16.7, 14.6 and 96.0 mg/dl, respectively, and by the Friedewald method were 65.2 ± 31.5, 4.6 and 184.2 mg/dl, respectively, with significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). The Direct method is recommended for determining LDL cholesterol levels in dogs.El objetivo del estudio fue comparar el método Directo con la fórmula de Friedewald para la determinación de colesterol LDL en caninos. Se tomaron 185 muestras de sangre de caninos adultos en ayuno y sin restricción de sexo. Se extrajo el suero y se determinaron los niveles de colesterol LDL con los dos métodos. El promedio, desviación estándar y valores mínimo y máximo por el método Directo fueron de 49.2 ± 16.7, 14.6 y 96.0 mg/dl, respectivamente, y por la fórmula de Friedewald fueron de 65.2 ± 31.5, 4.6 y 184.2 mg/dl, respectivamente, habiendo diferente estadística (p<0.05) entre métodos. Se recomienda el uso del método directo para la determinación de los niveles de colesterol LDL en caninos.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2014-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1080110.15381/rivep.v25i4.10801Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 25 No 4 (2014); 504-507Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 25 Núm. 4 (2014); 504-5071682-34191609-9117reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perúinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10801/9816Derechos de autor 2014 José Henry Osorio, Yirly Johanna Suárez, Jazmín Vinascohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T18:07:40Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
Comparación entre el Método Directo y la Fórmula de Friedewald para Determinar los Niveles de Colesterol LDL en Caninos
title COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
spellingShingle COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
Osorio, José Henry
LDL cholesterol
canine
direct method
friedewald method
colesterol LDL
perro
método directo
fórmula de Friedewald
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
title_sort COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA TO MEASURE LEVELS OF LDL CHOLESTEROL IN DOGS
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Osorio, José Henry
Suárez, Yirly Johanna
Vinasco, Jazmín
author Osorio, José Henry
author_facet Osorio, José Henry
Suárez, Yirly Johanna
Vinasco, Jazmín
author_role author
author2 Suárez, Yirly Johanna
Vinasco, Jazmín
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LDL cholesterol
canine
direct method
friedewald method
colesterol LDL
perro
método directo
fórmula de Friedewald
topic LDL cholesterol
canine
direct method
friedewald method
colesterol LDL
perro
método directo
fórmula de Friedewald
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was to compare the Direct method and the Friedewald formula method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in dogs. Blood samples were collected in 185 fasted dogs without sex restriction. Serum was extracted and levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the two methods. The mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values by the Direct method were 49.2 ± 16.7, 14.6 and 96.0 mg/dl, respectively, and by the Friedewald method were 65.2 ± 31.5, 4.6 and 184.2 mg/dl, respectively, with significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). The Direct method is recommended for determining LDL cholesterol levels in dogs.
El objetivo del estudio fue comparar el método Directo con la fórmula de Friedewald para la determinación de colesterol LDL en caninos. Se tomaron 185 muestras de sangre de caninos adultos en ayuno y sin restricción de sexo. Se extrajo el suero y se determinaron los niveles de colesterol LDL con los dos métodos. El promedio, desviación estándar y valores mínimo y máximo por el método Directo fueron de 49.2 ± 16.7, 14.6 y 96.0 mg/dl, respectivamente, y por la fórmula de Friedewald fueron de 65.2 ± 31.5, 4.6 y 184.2 mg/dl, respectivamente, habiendo diferente estadística (p<0.05) entre métodos. Se recomienda el uso del método directo para la determinación de los niveles de colesterol LDL en caninos.
description The aim of this study was to compare the Direct method and the Friedewald formula method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in dogs. Blood samples were collected in 185 fasted dogs without sex restriction. Serum was extracted and levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the two methods. The mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values by the Direct method were 49.2 ± 16.7, 14.6 and 96.0 mg/dl, respectively, and by the Friedewald method were 65.2 ± 31.5, 4.6 and 184.2 mg/dl, respectively, with significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). The Direct method is recommended for determining LDL cholesterol levels in dogs.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10801
10.15381/rivep.v25i4.10801
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10801
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v25i4.10801
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10801/9816
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2014 José Henry Osorio, Yirly Johanna Suárez, Jazmín Vinasco
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2014 José Henry Osorio, Yirly Johanna Suárez, Jazmín Vinasco
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol 25 No 4 (2014); 504-507
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 25 Núm. 4 (2014); 504-507
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
reponame_str Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
collection Revista UNMSM - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1701389171588857856
score 13.9573765
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).