El documento digital no refiere un asesor

Objective: To determine the relationship between effective time of surgery, with the factors of difficulty for the extraction of mandibular third molar. Materials and Methods: The study was descriptive. 30 extractions were evaluated by a maxillofacial surgeon. The parameters taken were: space, depth, spatial relationships, size of the follicle, and the integrity of bone and y mucosa, and form roots. We calculated the frequencies of the variables and covariates. It continues with a bivariate analysis using Pearson correlation coefficients, relating the time with all the variables. Results: The average time of third molar extraction was 9.63 min. It was found more frequently Class II, Level B, mesioangular position, size of follicle from 0 - 1 mm., completely covered by mucosa and partly by bone and the most common form of the roots were 2 / 3 combined and more than 2 / 3 apart. Conclusion...

Objective: To determine the relationship between effective time of surgery, with the factors of difficulty for the extraction of mandibular third molar. Materials and Methods: The study was descriptive. 30 extractions were evaluated by a maxillofacial surgeon. The parameters taken were: space, depth, spatial relationships, size of the follicle, and the integrity of bone and y mucosa, and form roots. We calculated the frequencies of the variables and covariates. It continues with a bivariate analysis using Pearson correlation coefficients, relating the time with all the variables. Results: The average time of third molar extraction was 9.63 min. It was found more frequently Class II, Level B, mesioangular position, size of follicle from 0 - 1 mm., completely covered by mucosa and partly by bone and the most common form of the roots were 2 / 3 combined and more than 2 / 3 apart. Conclusion...