Objetive. The critical reading of scientific articles allows the medical community, above all, to improve the context of decision making. The great amount of scientific production worldwide makes use of observational studies, however, a significant proportion is not useful for decision making, not because of its methodological limitations but because of errors in its application. Many studies published in relation to coronavirus 2019 disease have limitations and require statistical, epidemiological and clinical tools to be able to assess them and incorporate them into the practice of evidence-based medicine. In this review, we analyze the different observational research designs and with the help of examples we will see the different steps in the research process.

Introducción: La púrpura trombocitopénica trombótica puede presentarse en menos del 2 % de los pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico. Esta asociación implica un aumento de la mortalidad y un periodo de remisión más prolongado. Objetivo: Se presenta el caso de paciente peruana que desarrolló esta asociación y presentó complicaciones relacionadas con shock séptico. Caso clínico: Paciente femenina, con antecedente de púrpura trombocitopénica inmunológica y lupus eritematoso sistémico, acudió a emergencia por presentar palidez cutánea generalizada, petequias en miembros inferiores y hematuria. Posteriormente, su estado de salud se complicó con un shock séptico y deterioro del nivel de conciencia. Por todo esto, es referida a un hospital de mayor complejidad y hace su ingreso a la unidad de cuidados intensivos. La clínica y los exámenes de laboratorio revelaron hall...

Background & Aims: Vasoactive agents with endoscopic therapy are used to treat acute variceal bleeding (AVB). There are two main groups of vasoactive agents: terlipressin and vasopressin (T-V), and octreotide and somatostatin (O-S). However, the benefit/harm balance is unclear. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of T-V versus O-S for the management of AVB. Methods: We performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL. Our main outcomes were mortality and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were bleeding control, rebleeding, blood transfusion, hospital stay. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology. Results: We included 21 RCTs. The risk of mortality (RR: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.83-1.22), bleeding control (RR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.91-1.02; I2=53%), early rebleeding (RR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.66-1.24: I2=0%), late rebleeding (RR:...