1
artículo
Publicado 1984
Enlace
Enlace
Este trabajo trata de las limitaciones que el GobIerno está autorizado legalmente a hacer en relación a la vigencia de los derechos humanos y constitucionales dentro de los estados de excepción y,en concreto, trata los casos de guerra, amenazas internas y el principio de estricta necesidad. En cada uno de ellos, el autor discute detalladamente la casuística Y los términos posibles de definición, desarrollando extensas explicaciones sobrela jurisprudencia europea, del Comité de Derechos Humanos de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas y de la Comisión lnteramericana. Mención especial cabe, al caso Lawless, al caso de Grecia y al de Irlanda versus el Reino Unido de los organismos europeos y al Grupo de Trabajo Ad Hoc sobre Chile del sistema de las Naciones Unidas.
2
artículo
This work deals with the limitations that the Government is legally authorized to make in relation to the validity of human and constitutional rights within states of emergency and, specifically, deals with cases of war, internal threats and the principle of strict necessity. In each of them, the author discusses in detail the casuistry and the possible terms of definition, developing extensive explanations on the European jurisprudence, of the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations Organization and of the Inter-American Commission. Special mention is made of the Lawless case, the case of Greece and the case of Ireland versus the United Kingdom of the European organizations; and the Ad Hoc Working Group on Chile of the United Nations system.
3
artículo
This work deals with the limitations that the Government is legally authorized to make in relation to the validity of human and constitutional rights within states of emergency and, specifically, deals with cases of war, internal threats and the principle of strict necessity. In each of them, the author discusses in detail the casuistry and the possible terms of definition, developing extensive explanations on the European jurisprudence, of the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations Organization and of the Inter-American Commission. Special mention is made of the Lawless case, the case of Greece and the case of Ireland versus the United Kingdom of the European organizations; and the Ad Hoc Working Group on Chile of the United Nations system.
4
artículo
Publicado 2017
Enlace
Enlace
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure? Does it perform to the high standards with which it is generally regarded? Studies of peer review have shown that it is prone to bias and abuse in numerous dimensions, frequently unreliable, and can fail to detect even fraudulent research. With the advent of web technologies, we are now witnessing a phase of innovation and experimentation in our approaches to peer review. These developments prompted us to examine emerging models of peer review from a range of disciplines and venues, and to ask how they might address some of the issues with our current systems of peer review. We examine the functionality of a range of social Web platform...
