What does Tort Law seek through civil liability? Just deterrence? Punish the tortfeasor? Compensate the victim? The answers may be different according to certainly point of view, nevertheless we asked ourselves: what is “fair” in the civil liability context? Under that motivation, we tried to answer the following questions: is the way of justice suitable as is applied in non-economic loss cases in the Peruvian case law? And for that purpose, (i) we developed a philosophical framework about justices in this context, (ii) we described the legal doctrine and regulation framework, and (iii) we analyzed the criteria adopted in the Peruvian case law. Thus, through a systematic and dogmatic methods of interpretation, we reached a worrying conclusion: a suitable way of justice is not applied in Peruvian case law of non-economic loss in the context of Tort Law.

What does Tort Law seek through civil liability? Just deterrence? Punish the tortfeasor? Compensate the victim? The answers may be different according to certainly point of view, nevertheless we asked ourselves: what is “fair” in the civil liability context? Under that motivation, we tried to answer the following questions: is the way of justice suitable as is applied in non-economic loss cases in the Peruvian case law? And for that purpose, (i) we developed a philosophical framework about justices in this context, (ii) we described the legal doctrine and regulation framework, and (iii) we analyzed the criteria adopted in the Peruvian case law. Thus, through a systematic and dogmatic methods of interpretation, we reached a worrying conclusion: a suitable way of justice is not applied in Peruvian case law of non-economic loss in the context of Tort Law.

In this article the author presents the main concepts related to epistemology, science and the search for truth from the perspectives of Bunge, Tarski, Popper and Kuhn. Concepts that relates to an instrumental notion of law. All this with the aim of answering the question of whether or not there is a relationship between epistemology and law, and about what kind of relationship would exist. On this basis, and with a skeptical approach, it concludes by highlighting the relevance of science and law.

La presente investigación aborda la problemática de la razonabilidad de la decisión judicial en el Estado Constitucional de Derecho. Para ello, y bajo un enfoque argumentativo propio de una investigación cualitativa adaptada al estudio del Derecho, aborda tres puntos clave: En primer lugar, las principales teorías jurídico-filosóficas tales como el positivismo jurídico como legado de Kelsen y Hart, el iusnaturalismo de Finnis, las teorías principialistas de Dworkin y Alexy, y el escepticismo del realismo jurídico. En segundo lugar, la caracterización del Estado Constitucional de Derecho, y los paradigmas que refleja entre la legalidad y los derechos fundamentales, destacándose el rol del Tribunal Constitucional en ese sentido. Y, en tercer lugar, las exigencias de motivación de las decisiones judiciales, abordando tanto teorías de la argumentación como los modelos propuest...

¿Qué es lo que busca el Derecho de daños a través de la responsabilidad civil? ¿disuadir una conducta injusta? ¿castigar al agente dañador? ¿indemnizar a la víctima del daño? Las respuestas pueden ser diferentes de acuerdo a cada punto de vista, y sin embargo nos preguntamos ¿y qué es lo “justo” en la responsabilidad civil? Bajo esa motivación intentamos responder la siguiente inquietud en la presente investigación: ¿Se aplica una forma de justicia adecuada al Derecho Privado en los casos de responsabilidad civil extracontractual por daño no patrimonial en la jurisprudencia peruana? Y para tal efecto (i) desarrollamos un marco filosófico sobre la justicia en el ámbito señalado, (ii) describimos el desarrollo doctrinal y normativo referente al daño no patrimonial, y (iii) analizamos los criterios empleados en la jurisprudencia peruana. Así, a través de un método...

What does Tort Law seek through civil liability? Just deterrence? Punish the tortfeasor? Compensate the victim? The answers may be different according to certainly point of view, nevertheless we asked ourselves: what is “fair” in the civil liability context? Under that motivation, we tried to answer the following questions: is the way of justice suitable as is applied in non-economic loss cases in the Peruvian case law? And for that purpose, (i) we developed a philosophical framework about justices in this context, (ii) we described the legal doctrine and regulation framework, and (iii) we analyzed the criteria adopted in the Peruvian case law. Thus, through a systematic and dogmatic methods of interpretation, we reached a worrying conclusion: a suitable way of justice is not applied in Peruvian case law of non-economic loss in the context of Tort Law.

In this article the author presents the main concepts related to epistemology, science and the search for truth from the perspectives of Bunge, Tarski, Popper and Kuhn. Concepts that relates to an instrumental notion of law. All this with the aim of answering the question of whether or not there is a relationship between epistemology and law, and about what kind of relationship would exist. On this basis, and with a skeptical approach, it concludes by highlighting the relevance of science and law.

Partiendo de la idea de que los derechoscolectivos son merecedores de tutelajurisdiccional, el autor discute acerca de cómodebe otorgarse dicha tutela, enfocándose enlas decisiones estructurales por el alcanceque tienen en la sociedad y en la garantía delos derechos. En tal contexto, mediante elpresente artículo el autor pretende argumentarde qué manera deben intervenir las Cortespara la tutela de derechos colectivos. Paraello, realiza una revisión documental de lasprincipales objeciones formuladas al activismojudicial respecto a la adopción de decisionesestructurales. Concluye proponiendo unaconcepción dialógica como respuesta a talesobjeciones y como mecanismo idóneo para latutela jurisdiccional de derechos colectivos.

The analysis of scientific production in bioethics related to disability reveals a panorama in which the transition to digital scientific journals has facilitated access to knowledge in Latin America, supported by public policies and principles of openness. However, there is a disparity in the quantity and diversity of studies with a predominance of the English language and a significant concentration in Spain. This highlights the need for greater diversity and equity in scientific production, especially in Latin America. Research addresses a variety of crucial issues, from mental health to access to education and labor inclusion, but faces challenges such as the scarcity of studies in languages ​​other than English and the lack of attention to realities other than the English-speaking one. In conclusion, there is within the reality of scientific research, a predominance of publicati...