La globalización abre innumerables puertas para utilizar las Nuevas Tecnologías. En la actualidad actividades económicas, sociales, culturales y políticas se diseminan y realizan con mayor rapidez. Sin embargo, para acceder a estas oportunidades es necesario, además de contar con la tecnología, saber utilizarla. Esto hace que el conocimiento y la información se tornen imprescindibles y sean el producto más valioso en este proceso globalizador. No obstante, hay una gran desigualdad en las posibilidades que existen entre las personas para acceder a la información, al conocimiento y a la educación. A este fenómeno se le ha denominado brecha digital, que en otras palabras, es la separación que existe entre las personas, comunidades y países que utilizan las Nuevas Tecnologías de la Información (NTI) como una parte de su vida diaria y aquellas que no tienen acceso a las mismas ...

What does Tort Law seek through civil liability? Just deterrence? Punish the tortfeasor? Compensate the victim? The answers may be different according to certainly point of view, nevertheless we asked ourselves: what is “fair” in the civil liability context? Under that motivation, we tried to answer the following questions: is the way of justice suitable as is applied in non-economic loss cases in the Peruvian case law? And for that purpose, (i) we developed a philosophical framework about justices in this context, (ii) we described the legal doctrine and regulation framework, and (iii) we analyzed the criteria adopted in the Peruvian case law. Thus, through a systematic and dogmatic methods of interpretation, we reached a worrying conclusion: a suitable way of justice is not applied in Peruvian case law of non-economic loss in the context of Tort Law.

What does Tort Law seek through civil liability? Just deterrence? Punish the tortfeasor? Compensate the victim? The answers may be different according to certainly point of view, nevertheless we asked ourselves: what is “fair” in the civil liability context? Under that motivation, we tried to answer the following questions: is the way of justice suitable as is applied in non-economic loss cases in the Peruvian case law? And for that purpose, (i) we developed a philosophical framework about justices in this context, (ii) we described the legal doctrine and regulation framework, and (iii) we analyzed the criteria adopted in the Peruvian case law. Thus, through a systematic and dogmatic methods of interpretation, we reached a worrying conclusion: a suitable way of justice is not applied in Peruvian case law of non-economic loss in the context of Tort Law.

What does Tort Law seek through civil liability? Just deterrence? Punish the tortfeasor? Compensate the victim? The answers may be different according to certainly point of view, nevertheless we asked ourselves: what is “fair” in the civil liability context? Under that motivation, we tried to answer the following questions: is the way of justice suitable as is applied in non-economic loss cases in the Peruvian case law? And for that purpose, (i) we developed a philosophical framework about justices in this context, (ii) we described the legal doctrine and regulation framework, and (iii) we analyzed the criteria adopted in the Peruvian case law. Thus, through a systematic and dogmatic methods of interpretation, we reached a worrying conclusion: a suitable way of justice is not applied in Peruvian case law of non-economic loss in the context of Tort Law.