A specific theoretical and methodological context for a teaching proposal on psychological systems based on meta-theoretical analysis parameters and specific meta-scientific models is presented, with the aim of repositioning systems of psychology undergraduate courses, and their intellectual and procedural exercises, in the subsystem of the epistemology of the psychology. Firstly, the place of schools and systems in psychology's development is characterized. Secondly, international, regional and local debates that have taken place in the last decades regarding systematology as curricular content in psychologists' education are described. Thirdly, we describe the field of Anglo-Saxon theoretical psychology, where the comparative study of psychological systems is a central part of the field. In such a programmatic context, systematology, far from being an enunciative exercise of the concep...

Resuming the framework outlined in a previous analysis, the present work describes a proposal for teaching systems of psychology based on parameters of meta-theoretical analysis and specific meta-scientific models, with the aim of relocating psychological systems’ courses in systematology of psychology as a component of the epistemology of psychology. Three central issues for systematology in psychologists’ education are described: the importance of working with primary sources through specific pedagogical resources with the aim of developing scientific competences and attitudes, the need to have one (or several) sets of fixed parameters to comparatively analyze theoretical systems, and the problems, criteria and options available when contextualizing such comparative meta-theoretical analysis in comprehensive meta-scientific models which belong to the philosophy of science and of ps...

Este trabajo presenta un relevamiento y análisis de los vínculos entre la filosofía de la ciencia y la historiografía de la psicología durante los quince primeros años de la Historia de la Psicología como especialidad académica. Con el objetivo de caracterizar la recepción de las filosofías de la ciencia post-positivistas en el contexto del positivismo de los psicólogos experimentalistas, se recuperan y analizan las obras históricas centrales de dos historiadores seminales del período: Edwin Boring y Robert Watson. Se detalla la recepción activa de dichos autores de la filosofía de la ciencia de Thomas Kuhn en su primera edición (1962). Se puntualizan luego ciertas críticas sobre la modalidad de dicha recepción y sobre la adecuación general de la filosofía kuhniana respecto a la psicología. Finalmente, se esbozan brevemente ciertos cambios en la relación filosofía-...