With Heidegger, the detailed study of what it is and what questioning implies begins in the history of philosophy, since, with the exceptions of Plato and Aristotle and possibly Descartes, a question as such was neglected, despite the fact that it is in the field of philosophy that questioning achieves its maximum fulfillment. The reflections of this article study the links between Érōs and the question (erṓtēsis), an essential connection that, although it is not etymo-logical but phonetical, allows us to find the common amphibian structure that joins together these two dimensions and makes it possible to establish an essen-tial link between Érōs as the strength and the question as the place where that strength is expressed, what is nothing other than philosophy as love or aspiration to knowledge.In the question-answer unit is that knowledge as a unit of what is sought and what is...

Páginas 199-203

With Heidegger, the detailed study of what it is and what questioning implies begins in the history of philosophy, since, with the exceptions of Plato and Aristotle and possibly Descartes, a question as such was neglected, despite the fact that it is in the field of philosophy that questioning achieves its maximum fulfillment. The reflections of this article study the links between Érōs and the question (erṓtēsis), an essential connection that, although it is not etymo-logical but phonetical, allows us to find the common amphibian structure that joins together these two dimensions and makes it possible to establish an essen-tial link between Érōs as the strength and the question as the place where that strength is expressed, what is nothing other than philosophy as love or aspiration to knowledge.In the question-answer unit is that knowledge as a unit of what is sought and what is...

El artículo pretende ser una reflexión libre sobre la legitimidad de la exigencia a la filosofía formulada en la undécima tesis de Marx sobre Feuerbach. Esta, sin embargo,se refiere a un grupo determinado y a una manera de entender la filosofía, los neohegelianos llamados de izquierda y su concepción de la crítica, así como a Feuerbache inclusive a Hegel. Es en este contexto filosófico que hay que entenderla. Pese ala contraposición entre interpretación y tranformación que la tesis parece sugerir,el autor desarrolla la idea de que la unidadestá dada por el hombre que interpreta cosas,las ordena en teorías y actúa en el mundo.De allí que si se le pide a la filosofía que transforme el mundo se extralimita su poder,pero sin ella toda transformación es impensable

No presenta resumen

This note is a presentation, without pretending completion, of the doxographic tradition of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy, "showing their variation in meaning. lt deals with the attribution to Pythagoras of these terms'creation, starting with Plato's and Aristotle's decisive relevance in the establishment and configuration of doxography.

No contiene resumen

El artículo pretende ser una reflexión libre sobre la legitimidad de la exigencia a la filosofía formulada en la undécima tesis de Marx sobre Feuerbach. Esta, sin embargo, se refiere a un grupo determinado y a una manera de entender la filosofía, los neohegelianos llamados de izquierda y su concepción de la crítica, así como a Feuerbache inclusive a Hegel. Es en este contexto filosófico que hay que entenderla. Pese a la contraposición entre interpretación y tranformación que la tesis parece sugerir, el autor desarrolla la idea de que la unidad está dada por el hombre que interpreta cosas, las ordena en teorías y actúa en el mundo. De allí que si se le pide a la filosofía que transforme el mundo se extralimita su poder, pero sin ella toda transformación es impensable.

La nota es una presentación, que no pretende ser exhaustiva, de los principales momentos de la tradición doxográfica sobre los términos filósofo y filosofía mostrando sus variaciones de significado. Se discute la atribución a Pitágoras de la creación de esos términos a partir de la importancia decisiva de Platón y Aristóteles en el establecimiento y configuración de la doxografía.

El artículo pretende ser una reflexión libre sobre la legitimidad de la exigencia a la filosofía formulada en la undécima tesis de Marx sobre Feuerbach. Esta, sin embargo,se refiere a un grupo determinado y a una manera de entender la filosofía, los neohegelianos llamados de izquierda y su concepción de la crítica, así como a Feuerbache inclusive a Hegel. Es en este contexto filosófico que hay que entenderla. Pese ala contraposición entre interpretación y tranformación que la tesis parece sugerir,el autor desarrolla la idea de que la unidadestá dada por el hombre que interpreta cosas,las ordena en teorías y actúa en el mundo.De allí que si se le pide a la filosofía que transforme el mundo se extralimita su poder,pero sin ella toda transformación es impensable

No presenta resumen

This note is a presentation, without pretending completion, of the doxographic tradition of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy, "showing their variation in meaning. lt deals with the attribution to Pythagoras of these terms'creation, starting with Plato's and Aristotle's decisive relevance in the establishment and configuration of doxography.

With Heidegger, the detailed study of what it is and what questioning implies begins in the history of philosophy, since, with the exceptions of Plato and Aristotle and possibly Descartes, a question as such was neglected, despite the fact that it is in the field of philosophy that questioning achieves its maximum fulfillment. The reflections of this article study the links between Ér?s and the question (er?t?sis), an essential connection that, although it is not etymo-logical but phonetical, allows us to find the common amphibian structure that joins together these two dimensions and makes it possible to establish an essen-tial link between Ér?s as the strength and the question as the place where that strength is expressed, what is nothing other than philosophy as love or aspiration to knowledge.In the question-answer unit is that knowledge as a unit of what is sought and what is foun...