Construction and Validation of Questionnaires on Reflective Practice and Teacher Professional Development

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Porras Flores, Héctor
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad de Huánuco
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Huánuco
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.localhost:article/88
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.udh.edu.pe/index.php/udh/article/view/141e
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Humanos
Psicometría
Reproducibilidad de resultados
Encuestas y cuestionarios
Evaluación de resultados
atención médica
Practica profesional
Personal educativo
Humans
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Outcome Assessment
Health Care
Professional Practice
Educational Personnel
Psicometria
Reprodutibilidade dos resultados
Pesquisas e questionários
Avaliação dos resultados
Cuidados de saúde
Prática profissional
Pessoal educativo
Descripción
Sumario:Objective. To construct and validate questionnaires on reflective practice and practicing teacher professional development. Method. It was a psychometric study of content validity and reliability through the application of a pilot test. 20 expert judges participated in the first measure. Data were processed by Aiken's V coefficient, confirming values by dimensions. Results. For the professional development variable, the values were: pedagogical = 0.97, social personal = 0.96, and institutional = 0.98. For the reflective practice variable, the values were: reflection in practice = 0.98, reflection on practice = 0.97 and reflection for practice = 0.98. Similarly, for the pilot test, 18 subjects participated according to the profile required by the research, obtaining reliability results alfa = 0.901 on 30 items of the professional development construct, and alfa = 0.948 on 20 items of the reflective practice construct. It has allowed to structure items and articulate criteria and dimensions for each variable of the research. Conclusion. The measurement result of the questionnaires is reliable.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).